Laserfiche WebLink
SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) TO <br /> TECHNICAL EXAMINATION/ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS RECORD <br /> NUMBER CO-030-9-34 <br /> COLORADO WESTMORELAND, INC . <br /> SHORT-TERM COMPETITIVE COAL LEASE C-27432 <br /> This final Environmental Assessment (EA) has been prepared under <br /> the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Regulations, 40 CFR Part <br /> 1500, published November 29, 1978, and effective August 1, 1979. This <br /> EA follows the format described in the CEQ regulations, as interpreted <br /> by the State Director, Bureau of Land Management, Colorado, on May 10, <br /> 1979. 40 CFR Subpart 1500.4, "Reducing Paperwork" specifically directs <br /> agencies to reduce excessive paperwork. Subpart 1500.4(i) directs <br /> tiering from statements of broad scope to those of narrower scope. <br /> Subpart 1500.4(j) directs incorporation by reference. <br /> SECTION ONE -- PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE ACTION <br /> This EA has been prepared to supplement TE/EAR CO-030-9-34, <br /> Colorado Westmoreland, Inc. , Short-Term Competitive Coal Lease C-27432. <br /> The EA analyzes the environmental impacts of removal of Special Stipu- <br /> lation 30c in Federal Coal Lease C-27432 (issued August 14, 1979) . The - <br /> Special Stipulation limits the lessee, Colorado Westmoreland, Inc. (CWI ) <br /> to -a production level of 700,000 tons of coal per year. This production <br /> level was required by a court order (NRDC v. Hughes) in effect while the <br /> lease was being considered and TE/EAR CO-030-9-34 was being written. <br /> After the TE/EAR was written and the lease considered (but before <br /> it was issued) the Regulations for federally Managed Coal , 43 CFR Part <br /> 3400, were put into effect (July 19, 1979) . Under the new regulations, <br /> the BLM is not constrained by the court order and the limitation on <br /> production is no longer in effect. Since the court order was not in _ <br /> effect when the lease was issued, CWI immediately asked BLM to delete <br /> Special Stipulation 30c. In order to consider the impacts of this <br /> deletion, this EA has been prepared to supplement TE/EAR CO-030-9-34 <br /> (which only analyzed the 700,000 tons/year production level ) . <br /> If the Special Stipulation were deleted, CWI could produce coal <br /> from its lease at whatever it is allowed in an approved Mining Plan. <br /> (Mining Plans must be approved-by the Office of Surface Mining (OSM) , <br /> U.S. Department of the Interior, with input from the surface managing <br /> agency; in this case, BLM.) At present, CWI has an approved Mining Plan ^ . <br /> for 700,000 tons/year. It is assumed that if the special lease stipu- <br /> lation were deleted, CWI would submit a Mining Plan to OSM proposing a <br /> 1.3 million tons/year level of production. For analysis purposes in <br /> this EA, it is assumed that the Mining Plan will be submitted and <br /> approved, and that CWI will attain a• 1.3 million tons/year production <br /> rate. <br /> 1 : . <br />