Laserfiche WebLink
-24- <br /> For the ARCO Mt. Gunnison Mine, the worst case scenario would be if 224 acre- <br /> feet per year use for spraying the coal and 150 acre-feet per year use for <br /> potable water supply were entirely removed from the basin. On the average, this <br /> would amount to approximately 32 acre-feet of water each month. From Table <br /> 3, it appears (from column 5) that the months of August and September will <br /> be the critical months for removal of water from the watershed. In reality, <br /> most of the 150 acre-feet per year use of potable water will return to the <br /> North Fork of the Gunnison River. Consequently, ARCO's main concern will be <br /> the 224 acre-feet per year of water lost due to spraying activities. Since <br /> this amounts to less than 20 acre-feet per month, with some water being <br /> obtained from development of the mine, the net impact to downstream users <br /> should be minimal--assuming ARCO provides adequate storage for water to be <br /> used during dry months. <br /> The Bear, Somerset, and Blue Ribbon permit applications indicate that minor <br /> amounts of water may be removed from the basin due to their activities. Water <br /> will be removed from the basin through the spraying of coal and evaporation <br /> from sediment ponds, but this loss is expected to be minimal. Although avail- <br /> able data on these operations is not conclusive and additional monitoring <br /> data may be required, it appears that losses to the North Fork of the Gunnison <br /> River flows due to these mining operations will be minimal. <br /> The West-Central Colorado Coal Environmental Statement was reviewed for possible <br /> comparative purposes. However, the data was not used because information was <br /> in terms of broad generalizations or theoretical, unsubstantiated predictions. <br /> Water Quality Baseline Data <br /> The baseline water quality data for the North Fork of the Gunnison River is <br /> somewhat difficult to determine. The reason is a .Zack of data as published by <br /> the U.S.G.S. However, at the Somerset, Colorado gaging station on the North <br /> Fork of the Gunnison River, water quality data have been recorded since <br /> October, 1977. The values recorded are instantaneous values and do not reflect <br /> a long-term analysis. Table 6 illustrates how water quality parameters vary <br /> with respect to low flows, high flows, and flows existing during the middle <br /> of irrigation season when water is released from Paonia Reservoir. <br /> Impacts on Groundwater <br /> The six undergroun.d mines along the North Fork of the Gunnison may impact ground- <br /> water quantity by one or more of the following: <br /> - induced inflows into the mine through faults and fractures which provide <br /> communication between the mine and overlying and underlying aquifers <br /> and surface waters; <br /> - dewatering of the coal, roof and floo � with advance of mining; and <br /> - subsidence induced flows into the mine. <br /> 4 <br /> ��J) <br />