My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-07-30_REPORT - C1981012
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981012
>
2012-07-30_REPORT - C1981012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:04:18 PM
Creation date
8/6/2012 1:12:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
7/30/2012
Doc Name
Response to DRMS Letter of July 13, 2012
From
New Elk Coal Company
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Waste Pile/Fill Report
Email Name
JHB
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mine: NEW ELK <br />Waste Bank MSHA ID. No.: Primary Refuse Disposal Area (RDA) <br />Inspection Period: Third Quarter 2011 <br />Inspection Date: 8/29/2011 <br />General Description or Reference to Site Plan: <br />The Refuse Disposal Area is located north of State Highway 12 and the Middle Fork of the <br />Purgatoire River. Refuse is transported from the preparation plant to the RDA by conveyor belt. <br />The plant has been operating intermittently during 2011 with resumption of mining and trouble shooting <br />plant modifications. The operator has concentrated on improving grade on the working bench of the <br />RDA. Compaction tests conducted by CTL- Thompson determine that the pile is being constructed <br />as per approved plans. <br />Activity During Inspection: <br />New Elk Mine <br />QUARTERLY COAL WASTE BANK INSPECTION REPORT <br />CDMR Rules 4.09.1(11) and 4.10.2(2) <br />Operator was relocating refused placed temporarialy in the far northwest quarter of the RDA in 1996. <br />This refuse was being moved to and placed in one foot lifts on the front (south) third of the RDA. This <br />was being done to reduce the grade on the active surface and minimize the potential for erosion during <br />precipitation events. <br />Drainage: (Discussion of springs. seeps, overland and channel flow, underdrain construction and/ <br />or discharge, integrity of 100 -year 24 -hour drainage structures, and evidence of positive drainage). <br />No springs or seeps were observed on the refuse side slopes. Positive drainage is established on <br />all areas. Vegetation is well established on previously reclaimed areas. <br />Observation of Fill Construction: (Description of material, compaction, lift thicknesses, slopes, <br />and construction methods). <br />No new fill was placed during the inspection. <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.