Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Ms. Michelle Johnson <br />25 Ave SWSP <br />July 20, 2012 <br />Page 3 <br />combined total of 118.32 acre -feet per year. The applicant lagged this water Toss as per Exhibit <br />4 to the decree in 99CW231. Specifically, the IDS AWAS program was used with the following <br />parameters: <br />• X, distance from the well to the stream = 1,733 feet <br />• W, width of the alluvial aquifer = 11,503 feet <br />• T, Transmissivity = 1674,132 gallons per day per foot <br />• S, Specific Yield = 0.20 <br />The maximum lagged water Toss by year are 79.74 acre -feet for June through December 2012, <br />117.13 acre -feet for 2013, and 36.84 acre -feet for January through May 2014. See Table 1 for <br />the monthly breakdown of all depletions associated with this SWSP. <br />Replacement <br />The primary source of replacement water for this SWSP is excess accretions generated <br />by dewatering operations. Pursuant to paragraph 15 of the General Guidelines for Substitute <br />Water Supply Plans for Sand and Gravel Pits (updated April 1, 2011), accretions that occur at <br />the beginning of the dewatering operations may be claimed as replacement water to offset <br />depletions that occur due to the mining operations and the dewatering process, if the applicant <br />can account for the amount, location, and timing of these accretions. For the purpose of this <br />SWSP, accounting for the dewatering depletion /accretion on a monthly basis is acceptable. <br />Therefore, the dewatering operation must be metered with a totalizing flow meter that is read at <br />least monthly and the dewatering operations must operate so that it can be reasonably assumed <br />that all water dewatered in a given month is returned to the river in that same month. <br />Depletions to the river may no longer be replaced in time and amount by dewatering <br />accretions should the actual dewatering rate be Tess than the projected steady state of 850 <br />gallons per minute. Should dewatering accretions no longer be able to provide replacement <br />water for evaporative losses, Greeley's existing augmentation plan (water court case 99CW231) <br />may be used instead. Alternatively Greeley may elect to utilize various water rights owned or <br />controlled by the City of Greeley in the Cache la Poudre basin. In particular, Greeley may use <br />138 shares in the Boyd and Freeman Ditch that were previously owned by Flatiron Paving Co. <br />and used in previous gravel pit SWSPs for Greeley West Pit. Attached Table 3 summarizes the <br />historical consumptive use and return flow factors for the 138 Boyd and Freeman Ditch shares. <br />Greeley now owns these shares and will dedicate these shares as a replacement source in this <br />SWSP. Greeley may also release legally stored water from Flatiron Pits 1 and 2 (Poudre Ponds) <br />pursuant to its storage rights in water court case no 99CW234, which are decreed for <br />augmentation purposes. Table 4 presents a list of Greeley's water rights, and includes other <br />fully consumable sources which may be used for augmentation in this plan. <br />SWSP Conditions of Approval <br />I hereby approve the proposed substitute water supply plan in accordance with §37 -90- <br />137(11), C.R.S. subject to the following conditions: <br />1. This plan is approved with the effective date of June 1, 2012 and shall be valid through May 31, <br />2014 unless otherwise revoked or modified. If this plan will not be made absolute by a water <br />court action by the plan's expiration date, a renewal request must be submitted to this office <br />with the statutory fee of $257 no later than April 15, 2014. <br />2. Well permits no. 58476 -F and 59809 -F were previously obtained for these pits but will no <br />longer be valid with the implementation of this SWSP. A new well permit application has <br />been submitted to this office and is pending on approval of this plan. The provisions of § 37- <br />