Laserfiche WebLink
ensure that the objecting parties have sufficient time to property prepare for a formal hearing <br />without subjecting the Operator to unreasonable delay to the permitting process. Therefore, <br />unless the Operator is in agreement with the 30 day extension, the Statute and Rules state <br />that the Operator is entitled to a hearing to resolve outstanding objections within 30 days. <br />The Operator has indicated that they are not in agreement to a 30 day extension and that they <br />are prepared to proceed with the hearing on November 17-18, 2010. <br />Ms. Turner and Mr. Morgan requested that a hearing be set in this matter. The Division, <br />based on this request for hearing, has taken steps to prepare for this matter to be heard on <br />November 17-18, 2010. Ms. Turner filed her request for hearing on October 21, 2010. Prior <br />to this, Ms. Turner sent numerous letters to the Division regarding PR-06 and has been an <br />active participant in the Division's permitting process that began in December 2009. The <br />November 7 letter fails to state good cause for the requested 30 day extension as it fails to <br />specify why the 30 day extension of the formal hearing is necessary. <br />THEREFORE. the Division requests that the Board deny the Request for a 30 day extension <br />to the November 17, 2010 formal hearing. <br />Respectfully Submitted this 8th Day of November, 2010. <br />JOHN W. SLITHERS <br />Attorney General <br />