Laserfiche WebLink
class 11 soils can have no more than O. I percent of rock fra greaicr [Bali 3 im:h2s in the <br />surface horizon. Prime farmland can have no more than 10 percent rock tragmerim greater than 3 1 <br />inches in the surface layer. Several other important parameters such as available water holding <br />capacity permeability. FC. and texture are also more limited in range in class 11 soils than in <br />Prime Farmland. It is also important to note that the capability class oC lie best captures the <br />properties. advantages. and limitations for agricultural purposes of the Barx and similar soils <br />rather than the simple designation of Prime farmland. Also, it is important to note that within the <br />surface and subsoil ot't [iarx soil rock fragments do not exceed 0 percent (see Engineering <br />Index Properties table in the San Miguel ..Ikrea Soil Survey for map unit 14). <br />The next pan ofour visit Involved going onsite to the area of consideration. Several <br />areas were examined. The first was a cut-bank along the edge of the original farm ground. A <br />very fine sandy loam surface (Ap) (all textures determined by hand) was noted along with a <br />sandy clay loam arp n with accumulations of <br />,,-illic (Bt) followed b a silty clay loam horizo <br />calcium carbonate (Btk). Control section textures Nvere within the fine-loamy 0 9 to 35% clay) <br />class and would be representative of the Barx soils. No rock fragments were noicd \kithin the <br />soil layers examined. <br />The next site involved stock-piled material labeled OBI. Fh1s particular pile contained <br />numerous r(vk fragments (visually estimated to be bev,% cen 3 and 50 percent by volume) tip to <br />and including boulder-size (greater than 24 inches In dlainLLter), Color HOYR as opposed to <br />5YR) and texture (Clay-heavy Clay loam greater than 35 alp iii, with rock fragments <br />indicated that this material %Nas from a difTem-sit source than subsol I parent material for Marx_ <br />Salt crystals of undetermincd kind were also observed. We nCXj toured several other stock piles <br />located on the site. Some of these were labeled 31, 0131. and one pips was labeled AL The <br />piles labeled BI or OBI varied in color. texture. and rock fragments. The redder (5YR) material <br />was similar in texture to Bar\ soil ranges but did contain 0- to 10 percent rock fragments (visual <br />estimate), The other OB piles were graver in color (I OYR). heavier in texture (more clay)_ and <br />contained from 5 to 25 percent rock fragments (visual e�timatc). Much of the surfaces of the: <br />OBI piles also had undetermined salt crystals ofsome kind- Based on these charaLteristics, this <br />material most likely was from another source than the parent material that Rare soils derived <br />from. <br />The last area examined was identified by the farm operators as a location on the property <br />being reclaimed by the mine. The replaced subsoil appeared to be derived from another source. <br />i.e... not Barx, as noted previously. This 1 contained rock fragments up to and including <br />boulder-size and varied from 5 to 25 of4w, ,] % en location (visual estimates). When I tried to <br />excavate this material. it was very difficult. It had been compacted as was evidenced by the <br />platy structure observed, This material at the site also contained greater than ay (fine, <br />hand estimate)- We then proceeded to an area where topsoil material had been placed over this <br />.. other" material. Here the substratum material had been apparently rip and loosened <br />somewhat. - 1 - he topsoi layer appeared to he betr,veeri 18 to ' )0 inches t hic k (visua esti rnate) <br />along the contact face with the underl,, ing material exposure. The topsoil portion appeared to <br />have been disked. Surface fragnients occurring in this reclaimed topsoil. greater than 3 inches in <br />size, was visually estimated io he around 2 or percent. Mr. Morgan indicated that many of the <br />larger rock fragments had a] rcad-, been ' out" and removed by himself and Joellen. <br />Based on the [imitcd obscr% ations and estimates made on this site. several possible, <br />conclusions can be dra�%n. It should be noted that these conclusions are not based on any <br />chemical data anti deli not include permeability measurements. These properties arc of <br />importance to both Prime Farmland and Capabilit class determinations. <br />First. there is a significance difference bet%N cen ?rime Farmland and its properties and <br />"break points" and the Capability Classification properties, parameters. and ­lwak point-,­ of He <br />given to Barx soils in map unit 14. <br />Second, the first stock pile of material noted. above, OB I, would possibly/probably not <br />Tuesday, November 16, 2010.max <br />