Laserfiche WebLink
ARCADIS <br />The Reclamation Plan should discuss how the full -scale in -situ system will be optimized based upon the <br />results of the small -scale test. Figure 2 of the Reclamation Plan indicates that there will be a decision point <br />in the mine pool treatment plan to "Assess In -Situ Pilot Trial Results," and to either "Accept" or "Reject" the <br />in -situ approach. The Reclamation Plan needs a more detailed description of how this pilot (presumably <br />Action 3 above) will be conducted, what data will be gathered, and the criteria for accepting or rejecting <br />the approach based upon the pilot results. Extending the duration of the pilot testing may also prove <br />useful for designing the full -scale system. <br />Parameters to be monitored during the small -scale testing include sulfate /sulfide, pH, oxidation - reduction <br />potential (ORP), nitrate, ferrous /ferric, dissolved oxygen, and total organic carbon. Additional parameters <br />should be added, including arsenic, manganese, and radium concentrations. These parameters should be <br />monitored throughout the full -scale treatment. Finally, the proposed measure of long -term geochemical <br />stability is to analyze for uranium. Although not specifically detailed in the Reclamation Plan, the success <br />of the treatment approach during all phases of in -situ mine pool treatment would be better understood by <br />subjecting samples to analysis for the extended water quality suite described above. <br />Recommendations: Recommendations related to bench -scale and pilot -scale testing include: <br />• Conduct bench -scale testing prior to implementation of the small -scale and full -scale treatment. <br />The additional time and expense invested in bench -scale testing will help Cotter to better <br />understand the system conditions prior to full -scale testing, which will likely reduce the Tong -term <br />treatment costs. <br />• A more detailed description of the small -scale testing and the criteria for accepting or rejecting <br />the approach should be included in the Reclamation Plan. <br />• Establish more clearly defined benchmarks to guide the decision making process throughout <br />each stage of the in -situ treatment. <br />• Engage stakeholders in the process, particularly at key decision making points (e.g., completion <br />of bench -scale testing, completion of pilot -scale testing, following the initial full -scale treatment, <br />once stable long -term conditions have been achieved). <br />• The long -term monitoring program should include sampling and analysis of the mine pool water <br />quality (as discussed in Section 6.0 -Water Quality Monitoring Plan). <br />Bench testing will provide a basis for the design of the in -situ mine pool treatment trial. <br />In a properly controlled experiment, the testing can also help determine to what degree the RO <br />concentrate may be inhibiting to the treatment process. Given the nature of the mine pool, a complete <br />understanding of byproduct release/ secondary water quality effects may not be achieved from a bench <br />test, however testing will help to determine at what level these effects may be anticipated. <br />Conceptually, the testing would include collection of a limited volume of mine pool water and mine rock, <br />and in a microcosm test, combination of the water /rock and addition of organic carbon. Some treatments <br />Page. <br />13/16 <br />