My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-07-23_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M2012028
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M2012028
>
2012-07-23_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M2012028
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/7/2023 3:08:30 PM
Creation date
7/23/2012 3:40:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2012028
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
7/23/2012
Doc Name
PETITION FOR BOARD HEARING
From
MTAA LTD
To
DRMS
Email Name
DIH
GRM
TAK
AJW
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
require a DMO permit as detailed in Rule 3, 6, and 7 of the Hard Rock, Metal, and <br />Designated Mining Operation Rules and Regulations of the Colorado Mined Land <br />Reclamation Board (Rules) with an Environmental Protection Plan as specifically <br />detailed in Rule 6.4.21 and Rule 7. ". (Emp. Added) <br />"Please be advised that this opinion is being offered based on the information <br />provided in you response. The Mined Land Reclamation Board has requested that <br />the Division make determinations as to the need for a Mined Land Reclamation <br />Permit. If you have any concerns or disagree with this decision, you may petition to <br />appear before the Board during a formal public hearing for a formal Declaratory <br />Order concerning this matter. ". (Underlining added by MTAA LTD) <br />MTAA LTD'S ANSWER TO THE MLRA REPLY <br />In answer to the above Board letter Response, and in conformity with the above <br />cited case, we concur that we "will be required to obtain a Reclamation Permit from the <br />Mined Land Reclamation Board. ", and we have no objection to that requirement. <br />However, we most strongly object to Mr. Shuey's further conclusions as follows: <br />In addition, because the material to be excavated is apparently an acid and <br />toxic producing material, please be aware that this proposed operation will most <br />likely meet the defmition of a Designated Mining Operation (DMO) <br />and require a DMO permit with an Environmental Protection Plan. <br />( Shuey's citations removed) <br />Mr. Shuey cites no real authority for his erroneous conclusion. Thus, the key <br />words are APPARENTLY and MOST LIKELY. It is apparent to me that, because of the <br />prior involvement of the federal EPA. And, the confusion between the Mill Tailings (OU -7) <br />and the Asarco Gold Company (OU-4) site, that it is most likely safe to take this position. <br />We agree with Mr. Shuey that the Board should make the decision. Thus, we <br />encourage the Board to render a lasting decision to "FOSTER AND ENCOURAGE" the <br />Mining Industry of the State of Colorado so that prior mining sites can be Reclaimed, as <br />authorized and directed by the General Assembly and confirmed by the Colorado Supreme <br />Court; while at the same time, applying only reasonable restrictions that actually do <br />protect the Public Health. This Mined Land Reclamation request will provide new <br />economical uses of the land for the City's benefit, and provide new jobs for the area. <br />Our material is simply the Mill Tailings from the Homestead Milling Company that <br />operated on this site from 1880 to 1941. These Mill Tailings are simply Natural Occurring <br />Organic Material found all over the Rocky Mountains of Colorado. They simply are not <br />acidic or toxic by Nature. Otherwise, a DMO permit will be needed for all mining <br />operations in the State of Colorado. So far, this is simply not a current requirement. <br />MTAA LTD, Removal Permit, Page 5 of 10 pages. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.