My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-07-16_HYDROLOGY - M1977036
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M1977036
>
2012-07-16_HYDROLOGY - M1977036
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:03:28 PM
Creation date
7/23/2012 12:27:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977036
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
7/16/2012
Doc Name
COMBINED SUBSTITUTE
From
DWR
To
DRMS
Email Name
PSH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Table 1 <br />Martin Marietta Materials <br />Iverson Pit <br />2012 -2013 Projected Depletion <br />.rrssrar M <br />Notes: <br />(1) The exposed area associated with the dewatering ditch will change as additional areas are exposed for mining. It is assumed that the dewatenng ditch has a maximum width of 5 feet. <br />(2) Total gross evaporation (3 65 feet) is based upon NOAA Technical Report NWS 33 and distributed according to SEO Senate Bill 89 -120 criteria <br />November 4.0% February 3.5% May 12 0% August. 13.5% <br />December 3 0% March 5 5% June 14 5% September. 10.0% <br />January' 3 0% April: 9.0% July 15 0% October. 7 0% <br />(3) Equal to (1) x (2) <br />(4) Based upon the average precipitation at the Greeley UNC, CO (iD #3553) NOAA weather station for the time period 1967 -2010 <br />(5) Assumed 70% effective precipitation. (5) is equal to (4) x 70% <br />(6) Equal to (2) - (5). <br />(7) Equal to (lc) x (6) <br />(8) Evaporative depletions in (7) lagged using the Glover methodology in the IDS AWAS model using the following parameters <br />Transmissivity: 120,000 gallons/day /foot <br />Specific Yield. 0 2 <br />Aquifer Width- 2,497 feet <br />Distance from center of pits to river: 333 feet <br />(9) Projected future aggregate production from mining is based upon information from Martin Marietta Materials (MMM) Monthly production values are estimates and may vary so long as annual consumption is not exceeded <br />(10) Projected future aggregate production from mining is based upon information from Martin Marietta Materials (MMM) Water removed with mined aggregate equals 9.6 gallons/ton (4% of total mmed volume) as defined by Senate Bill 89 -120 <br />Therefore, (10) is equal to the projected aggregate production (in tons), multiplied by 9.6 gallons/ton, divided by 325,851 to convert gallons to acre -feet. <br />(11) Lagging of production use in (10) based upon the factors shown in (8). <br />(12) Equal to (8) + (11) <br />...�- e.t.a <br />Rt RRt, (r„t♦ , <br />la) lb <br />2 <br />3) <br />4 <br />5 <br />6) <br />7 <br />8 <br />9a 9b) <br />v (10) <br />11 <br />12 <br />Maximum Exposed Area in <br />gge <br />2012 acres <br />Gross <br />Net <br />Agggregate Production tons <br />Aggregate <br />Aggregate <br />Total <br />Gross <br />Evaporation <br />Average Total <br />Effective <br />Net <br />Evaporation <br />Lagged <br />Production <br />Production <br />Lagged <br />Dewatering <br />Evaporation <br />Volume <br />Precipitation <br />Precipitation <br />Evaporation <br />Volume <br />Evaporation <br />Crushed <br />Consumption <br />Consumption <br />Depletions <br />Month <br />Settling Pond ; Ditch <br />feet <br />ac -ft <br />feet <br />(feet) <br />feet <br />ac -ft <br />Volume ac -ft <br />of Washed <br />Washed <br />ac -ft <br />ac -ft <br />ac -ft <br />Jun -12 <br />0.07 038 <br />053 <br />0.24 <br />0 16 <br />0.11 <br />0.42 <br />019 <br />0 15 <br />0 <br />0 <br />000 <br />000 <br />0.15 <br />Jul -12 <br />007 038 <br />055 <br />025 <br />0.13 <br />009 <br />046 <br />021 <br />0.19 <br />0 <br />0 <br />000 <br />0.00 <br />0.19 <br />Aug -12 <br />007 038 <br />049 <br />0.22 <br />Oil <br />008 <br />0.41 <br />019 <br />0.18 <br />31,600 <br />8,400 <br />071 <br />056 <br />0.75 <br />Sep -12 <br />0.07 038 <br />037 <br />0 17 <br />009 <br />006 <br />030 <br />0 14 <br />0 15 <br />34,100 <br />7,520 <br />072 <br />0.67 <br />0.82 <br />Oct -12 <br />007 038 <br />026 <br />0 12 <br />009 <br />006 <br />0 19 <br />0.09 <br />010 <br />32,800 <br />8,200 <br />072 <br />0.70 <br />0.80 <br />Nov -12 <br />007 038 <br />0.15 <br />007 <br />006 <br />004 <br />010 <br />005 <br />0.06 <br />29,400 <br />7,350 <br />0.65 <br />066 <br />0.72 <br />Dec -12 <br />007 i 038 <br />0 1 l <br />0.05 <br />0.04 <br />003 <br />0.08 <br />0.04 <br />004 <br />10,000 <br />0 <br />0 15 <br />0.26 <br />0.30 <br />Jan -13 <br />0.07 0.57 <br />Oil <br />0.07 <br />004 <br />003 <br />0.08 <br />005 <br />005 <br />20,000 <br />0 <br />0.29 <br />030 <br />0.35 <br />Feb -13 <br />0 07 057 <br />0.13 <br />0.08 <br />003 <br />0.02 <br />Oil <br />0.07 <br />006 <br />1 44,775 <br />14,925 <br />1 10 <br />0.93 <br />1 1.00 <br />Mar -13 <br />007 0.57 <br />020 <br />0 13 <br />0.09 <br />006 <br />0 14 <br />009 <br />008 <br />67,000 <br />19,100 <br />1.55 <br />1.40 <br />1.48 <br />Apr -13 <br />007 057 <br />033 <br />021 <br />015 <br />Oil <br />022 <br />0 14 <br />0.13 <br />58,000 <br />18,600 <br />1.40 <br />1.37 <br />1.50 <br />May- 13 <br />007 0.57 <br />044 <br />0.28 <br />020 <br />014 <br />030 <br />0.19 <br />0 18 <br />61,600 <br />15,100 <br />l 35 <br />1.35 <br />1._53 <br />Total <br />3 65 <br />1.88 <br />1 20 <br />0 84 <br />2 81 <br />1.43 <br />1 38 <br />389,275 <br />99,195 <br />8.64 <br />L 821 <br />1 9.58 <br />Notes: <br />(1) The exposed area associated with the dewatering ditch will change as additional areas are exposed for mining. It is assumed that the dewatenng ditch has a maximum width of 5 feet. <br />(2) Total gross evaporation (3 65 feet) is based upon NOAA Technical Report NWS 33 and distributed according to SEO Senate Bill 89 -120 criteria <br />November 4.0% February 3.5% May 12 0% August. 13.5% <br />December 3 0% March 5 5% June 14 5% September. 10.0% <br />January' 3 0% April: 9.0% July 15 0% October. 7 0% <br />(3) Equal to (1) x (2) <br />(4) Based upon the average precipitation at the Greeley UNC, CO (iD #3553) NOAA weather station for the time period 1967 -2010 <br />(5) Assumed 70% effective precipitation. (5) is equal to (4) x 70% <br />(6) Equal to (2) - (5). <br />(7) Equal to (lc) x (6) <br />(8) Evaporative depletions in (7) lagged using the Glover methodology in the IDS AWAS model using the following parameters <br />Transmissivity: 120,000 gallons/day /foot <br />Specific Yield. 0 2 <br />Aquifer Width- 2,497 feet <br />Distance from center of pits to river: 333 feet <br />(9) Projected future aggregate production from mining is based upon information from Martin Marietta Materials (MMM) Monthly production values are estimates and may vary so long as annual consumption is not exceeded <br />(10) Projected future aggregate production from mining is based upon information from Martin Marietta Materials (MMM) Water removed with mined aggregate equals 9.6 gallons/ton (4% of total mmed volume) as defined by Senate Bill 89 -120 <br />Therefore, (10) is equal to the projected aggregate production (in tons), multiplied by 9.6 gallons/ton, divided by 325,851 to convert gallons to acre -feet. <br />(11) Lagging of production use in (10) based upon the factors shown in (8). <br />(12) Equal to (8) + (11) <br />...�- e.t.a <br />Rt RRt, (r„t♦ , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.