My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-06-25_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2012-06-25_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:01:48 PM
Creation date
7/20/2012 9:29:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/25/2012
Doc Name
SOIL RESOURCE INFORMATION
Section_Exhibit Name
Section 2.04.9 Soil Resource Information
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
as far as precipitation soaked soils. The likely hood of a dozer working during a severe <br />thunderstorm stacking topsoil is remote. Operationally, that dozer would be pulled out of that work <br />duty to assist the other mining operations such as clearing roads so coal haulage out of the pit <br />could continue. As far as loading, hauling and spreading the topsoil after it has been stacked by <br />the dozer is nothing to be concerned about either. The outer 2 -Y of the pile may be damp but not <br />the interior. Again, no worries or chances of any significant mixing of Lift Awith Lift B because after <br />Lift A is stockpiled on Lift B, then the interface is basically covered by several feet of Lift A and the <br />working area is good. <br />WFC does recognize that removing topsoil through saturated irrigation tailwater runoff ditches and <br />the sort could cause some intermixing of the different topsoil horizon(s) or subsoil layers. In this <br />situation, runoff water would be diverted to allow the soil to dry prior to stripping. In all cases, soil <br />removal operations will be conducted in a manner to ensure compliance with Rule 4.06.2(5). <br />17. Soil Volume Availability, February 2008 <br />This subsection is left intact forPR O6 since the topsoil volumes are based on the time frame when <br />the prime farmland soils were first identified, and the volume calculations changed since the <br />stripping procedures changed. An updated soil volume table is included in Section 2.05.4(2)(d) <br />which addresses the status of the soil salvage, stockpiling and replacement based on the <br />conditions as of June 2090. <br />In February 2008, the active pit was centered approximately 2100 feet west of 2700 Rad. <br />Map2.04.9 -2 depicts the location of undisturbed areas to the west, the area occupied by the active <br />pit, and the area between the pit and 2700 Road: those areas partially backfilled, those areas <br />across which Bench 1 substitute subsoil had been previously brought to grade; and those areas <br />where mixed topsoil had already been distributed. It was agreed that the Morgan property would <br />receive the same topsoil and subsoil that was present on the their property prior to mining. The <br />eastern portion of the Morgan property that has had substitute subsoil placement has been tested <br />Revised September 2010 (PR 06) 2.04.9 -42 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.