My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-07-13_REPORT - M1988044 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M1988044
>
2012-07-13_REPORT - M1988044 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:03:25 PM
Creation date
7/17/2012 3:51:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988044
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
7/13/2012
Doc Name
ANNUAL FEE/REPORT
From
MARK HEIFNER
To
DRMS
Email Name
BMK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
done a few days after this event. A second examination of the affected areas was done on July <br />3 and strong recovery was already noted in the sedimentation areas. <br />The East Valley apparently received a great deal of rain, as has occurred in the past <br />with this valley. A flash flood down this drainage completely removed the stream crossing <br />along with some of the old culverts. This crossing, which appears to date back to the Bombing <br />Range use as a bombing range, had been affected before, but this was the most it had been <br />affected in probably more than half a century. The crossing was replaced and new culverts <br />installed while two of the older culverts are still in place. It appears that the crossing was <br />overtopped by the flood waters and back cutting is what removed the crossing. The volume of <br />water was simply too great for even the large culverts to handle. Debris also was likely a <br />problem. <br />Downstream from the confluence of the East Valley and Coal Creek, damages were <br />minor with small amounts of sedimentation in some places. These areas should recover <br />quickly. <br />It appears from the pattern of sedimentation and flow that the various wetlands and <br />riparian vegetation that has been allowed to develop over the last six years or so did an <br />excellent job in preventing the storm waters from inflicting serious damage downstream. This <br />storm event was an excellent test and showed that the management actions for the riparian <br />corridor have been very effective at attenuating peak flows. <br />2. Topsoiling - As no land was ready for final reclamation, no topsoil was spread in the last <br />year. <br />A. Locations of topsoiling - As no land was ready for final reclamation, no topsoil was <br />spread in the last year. <br />B. Depth of topsoiling - As no land was ready for final reclamation, no topsoil was <br />spread in the last year <br />C. Final grading of topsolled lands - As no land was ready for final reclamation, no <br />topsoil was spread in the last year <br />3. Accommodation for drainage - Drainage in recently completed portions is stable with only <br />a small amount of sheet erosion during the intense storms of early June 2012. <br />4. Revegetation - No land was seeded in the last year. <br />5. Status of Prior Revegetation Areas - <br />A. Status of newest seedings as of report date - No new seedings were done. Therefore, <br />comments on revegetation status is covered in the next section. <br />E. Status of older revegetation as of report date (describe growth rates, cover, invasive <br />species, native invasion, and difficulties) - In June 2012, all older revegetation sites <br />that had not been released were inspected by the Division of Reclamation, Mining and <br />Safety (DRMS). All areas were approved for release. Therefore, these areas will no <br />Status report for 2012 due July 15, 2012 Page 5 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.