My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-06-08_PERMIT FILE - C2009087A (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C2009087
>
2012-06-08_PERMIT FILE - C2009087A (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2018 10:35:49 AM
Creation date
7/17/2012 2:11:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2009087A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/8/2012
Doc Name
NPDES Permit
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 2.05.3-E3 NPDES Permit
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PART II <br />Page No. 23 <br />Permit No.: C00048275 <br />iii Ten (10) times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant inthe permit application. <br />iv � The level established by the Division in accordance with 40 CFR § 122.44(f). <br />6. Bypass Notification <br />If the permittee knows in advance of the need for a bypass, a notice shall be submitted, at leastten days before the date of the <br />bypass, to the Division. The bypass shall be subject to Division approval and limitations imposed by the Division. Violatirns <br />of requirements imposed by the Division will constitute a violation of this permit. <br />7. Upsets <br />a. Effect of an Upset <br />An upset constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with permit effluent limitations if the <br />requirements of paragraph (b) of this section are met. No determination made during administative review of claims that <br />noncompliance was caused by upset, and before an action for noncompliance, is final administrative action subject to <br />judicial review. <br />b. Conditions Necessary for a Demonstration of Upset <br />A permittee who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset shall demonstrate through properly signed <br />contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that: <br />i) An upset occurred and that the permittee can identify the specific cause(s) of the upset; and <br />The permitted facility was at the time being properly operated and maintained; and <br />iii) The permittee submitted proper notice of the upset as required in Part II.A.4. of this permit (24 -hour notice); and <br />iv) The permittee complied with any remedial measure necessary to minimize or prevent any discharge or sludge use or <br />disposal in violation of this permit which has a reason able likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the <br />environment. <br />In addition to the demonstration required above, a permittee who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset for a <br />violation of effluent limitations based upon water quality standards shall also demonstrate through monitoring, modeling <br />or other methods that the relevant standards were achieved in the receiving water. <br />c. Burden of Proof <br />In any enforcement proceeding the permittee seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset has the burden of proof. <br />8. Discharge Point <br />Any discharge to the waters of the State from a point source other than specifically authoized by this permit is prohibited. <br />9. Proper Operation and Maintenance <br />The permittee shall at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and control (and relaed <br />appurtenances) which are installed or used by the permittee as necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of this <br />permit. Proper operation and maintenance includes effective performance and adequate laboratory and process controls, <br />including appropriate quality assurance procedures. This provision requires the operation of backup or auxiliary facilities or <br />similar systems which are installed by the permittee only when necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of the <br />permit. <br />10. Minimization of Adverse Impact <br />The permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge of sludge use or disposal in violation ofthis <br />permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting humanhealth or the environment. As necessary, accelerated <br />or additional monitoring to determine the nature and impact of the noncomplying discharge is required. <br />11. Removed Substances <br />Solids, sludges, or other pollutants removed in the course of treatment or control of wastewaters shall be disposed in <br />accordance with applicable state and federal regulations. <br />For all domestic wastewater treatment works, at industrial facilities, the permittee shall dispose of sludge in accordan a with <br />all State and Federal regulations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.