Laserfiche WebLink
Introduction <br />This report is for the period from January 1, 2012 through June 2012. Mine <br />Construction of the Bowie No. 2 Mine began during May of 1997, with coal production <br />beginning during August 1997. <br />The mining permit application for the Bowie No. 2 Mine requires the operator to submit <br />the results of the subsidence monitoring programs and the results of the visual <br />inspections of known modern and historic landslides within the permit and adjacent <br />area for stability in June and December of each year and report these results to the <br />Division within 30 days of the end of the reporting period. <br />The Operator is also required to inspect these landslides, both modern and historic, <br />monthly for six months immediately after retreat mining occurs. This same inspection <br />routine is applied to any spring or pond in the immediate proximity of retreat mining. <br />During the reporting period, mining continued in the 2 West Mains. The B -11 longwall <br />was completed during April 2012. The B -12 headgate was completed and the B -12 <br />longwall was advanced about 1,500 feet. The B -13 headgate has advanced about <br />1,700 feet. <br />Visual Inspection of known historic and modern landslides. <br />A visual inspection of all known historic and modern landslides was conducted during <br />May 2012 by Brad Lindsay, Rock Logic Consulting LLC. Mr. Lindsay's report is <br />attached. Twenty seven individual cracks were observed covering almost the entire B- <br />11 panel. Many, but not all the cracks roughly follow the surface topography. Some <br />cracks near the edge of the B -10 panel appear to correlate with cracks observed last <br />fall. Cracks over the B -10 panel still exist, but are beginning to heal. <br />Increased Inspection activity associated with retreat mining. <br />Accessible subsidence cracks are repaired during coal exploration events and are <br />monitored by both coal exploration supervisors and hydrologic monitoring technicians. <br />During the period there were no springs or ponds potentially impacted or re- impacted. <br />Potentially impacted or re- impacted means the mine workings or angle of draw of the <br />mine workings passed under the monitoring point during the reporting period. No <br />influence to any hydrologic monitoring points was observed during this period. <br />Results of Subsidence Survey Monitoring <br />The results of the May 2012 monitoring are attached. As in the past, the survey was <br />performed by Cragg Surveying using GPS methods. <br />Analysis of Subsidence Data <br />The following table presents an analysis of the subsidence survey data. Subsidence <br />survey requirements are shown on PAP pages 2.05 -163 and 164. Following is a <br />summary of the survey data collected during the period. <br />-2- <br />