Laserfiche WebLink
workings prior to discharge into the Colorado River. A storm water permit and spill prevention <br />containment and control plan associated with the CDPS permit also dictate preventative and <br />mitigation measures for ensuring that all water leaving the mine site meets applicable effluent <br />limits. <br />Receiving stream standards for the Lower Colorado River have been set by the Colorado <br />Department of Health and Environment in their publication "Classification and Numeric <br />Standards for Lower Colorado River Basin." The Colorado River at this point is within segment <br />2 of the Lower Colorado River sub -basin and basin and Coal Creek is within segment 4 of the <br />Lower Colorado River sub -basin and basin. CDPS permit limitations on discharge, the permit's <br />discharge standards, and the Division's standards for determining material damage to the <br />hydrologic balance ( "Division Procedures for the Assessment of Material Damage with Respect <br />to Alluvial Valley Floors, the Cumulative Hydrologic Impact Assessment and Subsidence at <br />Coal Mines ") are based, in part, on these standards. The Roadside Portal Mines' standards for <br />discharge are listed in Table 2.05.6 A of the permit application. The mines' baseline water <br />quality data is found in Section 2.04.7 of the permit application. <br />The CDPS permit had in the past included a specified salinity standard of not more than one ton <br />per day or 350 tons per year of total dissolved solids, whichever is less. The Roadside Mines <br />salinity discharge exceeds this level, primarily due to mine water discharges. As a result, the <br />operator was required by the Colorado Department of Health and Environment (DOH) to prepare <br />a report outlining possible approaches to reducing the mines' contributions of salt to the <br />Colorado River, and associated costs. This report, "Evaluation of Alternatives for Management <br />of Salt in Mine Water Discharges: Roadside and Cameo Mines; Powderhorn Coal Company; <br />Palisade, Colorado." was completed in February, 1993. Based on the report, DOH made a <br />determination that salt elimination or reduction would not be economically feasible, and granted <br />an exemption from salinity standards (3/17/93 letter, Appen. 17 -2). DOH has not revised that <br />determination, and it remains valid. <br />The Division has granted a number of small area exemptions from the use of sediment ponds due <br />to the limited size of the areas in question and due to the fact that ponds and treatment facilities <br />are not necessary for the drainage from these sites to meet the effluent limitations of Rule 4.05.2 <br />and applicable State and Federal water quality standards for receiving streams and also due to <br />the fact that no mixing of surface drainage from these areas with a discharge from underground <br />workings will occur. The small areas to be exempted are listed in Volume 3, Appendix 13 -3 of <br />the permit application (4.05.2(3)(b)(i)). <br />In 1997, Pond 12 was designed to act as a mine water treatment pond for the mine water <br />discharge associated with the Roadside North Portal Mine, NPDES discharge point 004. <br />Discharge from the North Portal Mine required pumping, which ceased in December 1999 when <br />operations ceased. Outfall 004 has been discontinued and Pond 12 has been eliminated by <br />reclamation operations. <br />Discharge Outfall 015 had been approved for minewater discharge from the South Mine 2 West <br />Portals. The outfall was never activated and the 2 West Portals have been sealed and reclaimed. <br />Only two approved minewater discharge sites remain, both at the South Mine. Outfall 016, <br />located near the North Decline Area is the primary dewatering site. Outfall 002, the siphon <br />discharge system at the reclaimed Northwest Intake Portal, has been retained as a back -up <br />Permit Revision No. 5 21 July 10, 2012 <br />