My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-06-28_REPORT - C1982057
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2012-06-28_REPORT - C1982057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:02:03 PM
Creation date
7/3/2012 2:38:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
6/28/2012
Doc Name
2011 Annual Hydrology Report Part 1 through Appendix B
From
Peabody Energy
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2011
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
SLB
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(6586 + 5.3% = 9058 mg /1) . In 2008 and 2009, unusually high TDS values <br />of 16,700 and 14,300 mg /1 were observed at this well. These values are <br />over twice the historic average, 7736 mg /l, for this well. The TDS value <br />for this well in 2010 dropped back down to a value within the 1988 -2007 <br />range, but increased to a value above that range in 2011. <br />The Seneca II -W PHC predicts an annual average TDS value of 2630 mg /1 <br />for.Well WW14, while a value of 5000 mg /l was observed this year. For <br />Well WW17, a value of 3002 mg /l was predicted, while a value of 660 mg /l <br />was observed this year. <br />As noted in the previous paragraph, Well WW14 experienced this year a <br />TDS exceedance of the PHC prediction. This prediction was based on <br />several assumptions. 1) Baseline water quality values were an average of <br />all Wadge coal wells at Seneca II -W. 2) Aquifer characteristics were an <br />average of all Wadge coal wells at Seneca II -W. 3) The Wadge coal seam <br />was saturated for its entire thickness (11.8 feet). <br />These assumptions, however, do not hold true for Well WW14. Prior to <br />mining in the north area (November 1992), this well was almost always <br />dry (see the 1993 AHR for a complete listing of earlier water level <br />data). Since this particular portion of the Wadge seam was dry prior to <br />mining, spoils water will now contribute 100% of the water present. <br />Agricultural ground water standards were exceeded this year at certain <br />monitoring wells. Tab 7 of the Seneca IT -W PAP contains a section that <br />discusses the suitability of using water from the various aquifers <br />monitored at the Seneca II -W Mine for irrigation or livestock watering. <br />The discussion mentions that all aquifers prior to mining at the Seneca <br />II -W Mine have exhibited several parameter concentrations in excess of <br />both irrigation and livestock standards compared, rendering them <br />questionable regarding their suitability for either irrigation or <br />livestock. All bedrock aquifers affected by mining have been determined <br />to have transmissivities less than 100 ft2 /day, which would also <br />preclude their use for yielding sufficient water for irrigation, or even <br />livestock. <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.