Laserfiche WebLink
June 19, 2012 C -1980- 007 /West Elk Mine JRS <br />BACKFILL and GRADING — Rule 4.14 Contemporaneous Reclamation 4.14.1; Approximate Original Contour <br />4.14.2; Highwall Elimination 4.14.1(2)(f); Steep Slopes 4.14.2,4.27; Handling of Acid and Toxic Materials <br />4.14.3; Stabilization of Rills and Gullies 4.14.6: <br />- While this inspection primarily focused on Phase II Bond Release criteria, the overall stability of the backfilled <br />and regraded areas is still important and taken into account during a Phase II Bond Release. None of the <br />approximately 33 sites, including MDW pads and roads, the thermal event area pads and roads and the lone Pine <br />Gulch facilities areas showed any signs of cracking, settling or slumping. all of the sites were stable and well <br />vegetated, with no erosional problems noted. Please see the Reclamation Success section below for detailed <br />information regarding each location. <br />FISH and WILDLIFE — Rule 4.18: <br />- Aside from ground squirrels and birds, no wildlife was observed on the reclaimed sites at the time of the <br />inspection. There were, however, signs of large game mammals on virtually all of the sites. These sign included <br />bear, elk and coyote scat and bear, elk and coyote tracks. there was also evidence of bears overturning large logs <br />on the reclaimed roads to get to ant hills under the logs. Based on these observations, it appears as though there is <br />extensive wildlife use on these reclaimed sites. <br />ROADS — Rule 4.03 Construction 4.03.1(3)/4.03.2(3) Drainage 4.03.1(4)/4.03.2(4) Surfacing and Maintenance <br />4.03.1(5) and (6)/4.03.2(5) and (6) Reclamation 4.03.1(7)/4.03.2(7): <br />- There were several roads that are still in service (not reclaimed) that are used to access the reclaimed road spurs <br />and pads and active drilling. These roads include the Jumbo Mountain Road, West Flat Iron Road, Long Draw <br />Saddle Road and the Old Road. All of these roads were well maintained and stable and no erosional problems <br />were noted on the roads. The roads were very dry and dusty at the time of the inspection. We also drove along <br />Forest Service Road 711, which was somewhat rutted due to the road's multiple uses. This road was, however, <br />generally stable and in good condition. It, too, was very dry and dusty. <br />RECLAMATION SUCCESS - Rule 4.15, Rule 3: <br />- The first area inspected was the reclaimed Upper Deep Creek Road, Deep Creek Mesa Road and the reclaimed <br />96 -36 -1 drill pad. The reclaimed roads and pad were approximately 8.8 acres of disturbance and were reclaimed <br />in 2004. The roads and pad were all stable, with no erosional problems noted. There was good cover on both the <br />roads and the pad and shrubs, including chokecherry, snowberry, oak brush and, in some places, sagebrush, were <br />beginning to grow on the reclamation (even though they were not a part of the seed mix). Dominant grass and <br />forb species included western wheatgrass, mountain brome, Kentucky bluegrass and yarrow. There were scattered <br />Canada thistle on the reclaimed roads and a larger patch (approximately 1/4 acre) on the drill pad. There was also <br />some hound's tongue seen on the roads. These weeds will need to be sprayed and monitored. Overall, the <br />reclamation on the Upper Deep Creek Road, Deep Creek Mesa Road and the reclaimed 96 -36 -1 drill pad was very <br />good. <br />Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 12 <br />Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 4 <br />Page 3 of 31 <br />