My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-06-29_REVISION - C1981012
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981012
>
2012-06-29_REVISION - C1981012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:02:06 PM
Creation date
6/29/2012 2:42:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/29/2012
Doc Name
Preliminary Adequacy Review
From
DRMS
To
New Elk Coal Company, LLC
Type & Sequence
TR66
Email Name
ZTT
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br /> <br /> <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br /> <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br /> <br />June 29, 2012 John W. Hickenlooper <br /> <br /> <br />Governor <br /> <br /> <br />Mike King <br /> <br />Executive Director <br />Ron Thompson <br /> <br /> <br />New Elk Coal Company, LLC <br />Loretta E. Pineda <br /> <br />Director <br />122 West First Street <br /> <br />Trinidad, CO 80182 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Re: New Elk Mine (Permit No. C-1981-012) <br /> <br /> Technical Revision No. 66 (TR-66) <br /> <br /> Preliminary Adequacy Review <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Thompson: <br /> <br />The Division has completed a preliminary review of the TR-66 application and has the following comments. <br /> <br />1. Please provide a description on how the proposed Haul Road to the RDA will be used in support of <br />the post mining land use, as defined in Section 1.04(71), per Rule 4.03.1(f)(i). The Division feels that <br />in order for the proposed Haul Road to remain post mining, it must provide practical use in <br />conjunction with its post mining land use. <br /> <br />Please provide a letter from the legal or equitable landowner that would request the <br />2. <br />proposed Haul Road to remain left open for further use post mining as required by Rule <br />4.03.1(f)(ii). <br /> <br /> <br />It is unclear on whether the proposed Haul Road design width is appropriate for the overall <br />3. <br />size of vehicles and volume of traffic. The typical Remote and RDA Haul Road cross <br />section found on Map 1-Sheet 1 shows the Haul Road having a 10 foot minimum width. <br />Please provide a description on how this width will be suitable for the anticipated traffic or <br />if additional construction of the Haul Road will be needed to attain appropriate width as per <br />Rule 4.03.1(3)(c). <br /> <br /> <br />4. The final two paragraphs on Page 2.05-10 discussing the SAE south of Pond 7 and the cut slopes <br />above the upper divisions ditch at the Bates Portal have been removed. Please provide an explanation <br />on why these discussions were removed from Page 2.05-10 or submit a revised page including these <br />paragraphs. <br /> <br /> <br />5.There appears to be an an error on Map 13 – East Portal Sediment and Surface Water <br />Control Plan. There is an additional culvert “C-A” near the bottom of the haul road to the <br />RDA. Please submit a revised Map 13 correcting this error. <br /> <br /> <br />Office of Office of <br /> <br />Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.