My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1996-04-08_HYDROLOGY - M1977378 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M1977378
>
1996-04-08_HYDROLOGY - M1977378 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2021 10:10:58 PM
Creation date
6/29/2012 7:01:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977378
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
4/8/1996
Doc Name
Comments
From
Animas Watershed Coordinator
To
CDPHE-WQCD
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
999 <br /> I ✓ANHWAS WATERSHED COORDINATOR <br /> SDURANGO,CO$1301 �:fi i? ~" son <br /> FAX&PHONE(M)3354130 <br /> MCD Pemills Sargon <br /> Robert). Sbukle,Chid <br /> Water Quality Contra!Division <br /> Colo.Depart.Public Health and Environment ,/ <br /> 4300 Cheney Creole Dt.S. m- l 1 77 37k <br /> i Denver,Colorado 80220-3716 <br /> Dear Mr. Sbukle <br /> The fo moms to the S <br /> � ��8� unayside(fold Corp./CDPI�set<id»aa <br /> agreement tad attacise`� arc Remy wbich I"map trot presently be adequately <br /> addressed. These are personal comments as an Animas River Stakeholder sad do in no <br /> way represent the opinions or positions of other stakeholders. <br /> i <br /> I. Comments rdating to pages ofthe Consent D=ft <br /> A Page I$—Do Cemm Cretin flows above the treatment plait(whlCT!are to be <br /> mated)approxVme those from the American linen$? If they are Im than tM <br /> loss of the treated tunnel water(d&diag)to Cement Credo wilt not be totally offset <br /> by treating Cement Creek. Monitoring at C34 and A72 should r.&d this, <br /> H. Page 18-Monitoring of Mitigation Sites. Eureka is not on this Hat This site is <br /> most important to have daily nmitocing to determine effects of activities so loss of <br /> aquatic M can be avoided. (also see H-D blow) <br /> I <br /> C. Page 22--WhyM&treatment of Cement Creek cease? This should not be a <br /> mquiramertt. It would seem to me that by etimintting this requkew t these would <br /> be nothing bet; Stmnyside or other interests may want to oontinue tfeaWNK of <br /> treat water from other sources. I real; their OMM reclamation pt mat with <br /> DMG must stipulate this plant be removed but this may be owthe r ummmmary <br /> road block to innovative cleanups in the A t„m. <br /> D. Page 25—Defioe BAT standards <br /> E. Page 26 Sentence 1,add "or owner peraission" <br /> F. item d,page 7: W91 the State be We to trek the Letter of credit moration date, <br /> notice of Shemate letter of credit,and the ten day period so that the State can <br /> draw a draft of ow letter of c"Ki t if neo"Mey t <br /> i <br /> I <br /> i <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.