My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1996-06-12_ENFORCEMENT - M1977378
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Minerals
>
M1977378
>
1996-06-12_ENFORCEMENT - M1977378
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2021 7:17:42 AM
Creation date
6/29/2012 7:01:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977378
IBM Index Class Name
ENFORCEMENT
Doc Date
6/12/1996
Doc Name
Sunnyside Gold Corp v. WQCD
From
Dufford & Brown, P.C.
To
Echo Bay Mines
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a permit may be needed. <br /> Response: SGC has submitted to EPA a letter requesting a determination if it is <br /> subject to a UIC permit, and if so, if it fits under the general permit. <br /> Comment: The target pH in the workings (or pH range) should also be mentioned. <br /> Response: The specifics of the mitigation projects, including the mine pool <br /> mitigation project (with target pH ranges for the injection water and Mine pool), are <br /> appropriately discussed in the Work Plans for the projects attached to the permit for <br /> mitigation projects (Appendix Q. See also response to Appendix B comment 1. <br /> 4. Comment: Pages 13 and 14, Paragraph 9.a.: For the determination of equilibrium - <br /> what is meant by the "rate of rise has leveled off"? EPA suggests adding another <br /> appendix to the Consent Decree which describes the process for determining if <br /> equilibrium has been met. Does the notice by SGC that equilibrium has been reached <br /> need to provide supporting data and describe how SGC reached that conclusion? The <br /> text is a little unclear concerning what exactly is required to be provided. Is it <br /> appropriate to reference the Mined Land Reclamation (AILR) Permit and technical <br /> revisions? <br /> Response: The WQCD's entering into this Consent Decree is partly in response to <br /> the approval by the Mined Land Reclamation Board of SGC's proposal to install <br /> bulkhead seals in the Sunnyside Mine portals. Mine pool equilibrium is defined in <br /> SGC Mined Land Reclamation permit, as stated in the Consent Decree. The WQCD <br /> is providing EPA that portion of SGC's Mined Land Reclamation permit. That <br /> determination is-within the jurisdiction of the Division of Minerals and Geology, not <br /> the WQCD. Therefore, neither adding another appendix to the Consent Decree <br /> describing when equilibrium has been met nor referencing the MLR permit (other <br /> than the existing references to it on pages 4-5), as suggested by EPA, would be <br /> appropriate. <br /> Comment. What does "maintenance" of the portion of the American Tunnel <br /> downstream of the SGC property mean? This term should be defined so it is clear <br /> what action(s) will trigger the release of SGC from its permit for the American <br /> Tunnel. <br /> Response: EPA states that the term "maintenance" is unclear in the sentence "Should <br /> maintenance of the portion of the American Tunnel downstream of the SGC property <br /> line seal and treatment of the American Tunnel discharge be undertaken by the <br /> property owner or other parties, then SGC will be released from any continued CDPS <br /> permit obligation at the American Tunnel." This sentence is taken from the summary <br /> of work, which work is described in greater detail in other parts of the Consent <br /> Decree. This sentence follows another that clarifies that this sentence is relevant only <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.