Laserfiche WebLink
III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br /> 999 <br /> SUNNYSIDE GOLD CORPORATION RFcEIVED <br /> AM EC210 8"COMPANY <br /> P.O. Box 177 .Silverton, CO 81433 <br /> �CT 19 199 <br /> Phone (303) 387-5533 .Telecopy (303) 387-5310 <br /> i)ivision of Minerals&Geology <br /> October 17, 1994 <br /> Allen Sorenson, Reclamation Special i s,t <br /> Department of Natural Resources <br /> Division of Minerals and Geology <br /> 1313 Sherman St. , Room 215 <br /> Denver , CO 80203 <br /> RE: Revision TR-`14, File No. M-77-378 , Commitment #4 <br /> Dear Mr . Sorenson: <br /> On November 18 , 1993, the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board <br /> approved Technical Revision No. 14 (TR-14) conditioned upon four <br /> commitments by Sunnyside Gold Corporation (SGC) . This submittal is <br /> to address Commitment #4 which is copied below for reference. <br /> COMMITMENT NO.4 <br /> THE OPERATOR WILL PROVIDE THE DIVISION WITH A PLAN TO CHARACTERIZE <br /> CONJUNCTIVE FLOW WITHIN THE CEMENT CREEK DRAINAGE IN THE VICINITY <br /> OF THE SUNNYSIDE MINE WITHIN 30 DAYS OF REVISION APPROVAL. <br /> A conceptual plan prepared by Golder Associates Inc . (Golder) was <br /> submitted December 17, 1993 and was accepted by DMG (letter dated t <br /> December 22, 1993) pending results of proposed geophysical work and <br /> piezometer completion. i a <br /> Under Golder ' s direction, the conceptual plan was implemented . The <br /> report prepared by Golder is attached for your review. Geophysical <br /> work was done prior to drilling but the results are not covered in <br /> the report because they were uninterpretable. This was probably `- <br /> due to a frozen ground layer or multiple soil layers complicating <br /> the signals. <br /> From the data obtained for the study and analysis of that data , <br /> Golder reached the following conclusion (CEMENT CREEK CONJUNCTIVE <br /> FLOW CHARACTERIZATION - SUNNYSIDE MINE, Golder Associates, p. ES- <br /> "Results indicate that groundwater flow is at most <br /> approximately 0. 4% of the total conjunctive flow and <br /> therefore does not significantly affect the volume of <br /> conjunctive flow. Accordingly, monitoring of surface <br /> water flow in Cement Creek is sufficient to determine the <br /> effects of adit plugging on the total flow in the creek <br /> and no further groundwater monitoring is recommended. " <br />