My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1989-06-08_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1989-06-08_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2021 10:38:45 AM
Creation date
6/25/2012 3:01:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
6/8/1989
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP)
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
THE CRYSTAL RIVER, DRAINAGE STUDY <br /> August 1578 to May 1973 u Z <br /> 11 <br /> Introduction � � j UIN 198� I�- <br /> +YCG - ;:'tELf"-SEHvu_F_S <br /> A water quality investigation of the Crystal River drainaohMO?-•I-kDRINGSECI1ON <br /> GPA\0 JUNCTION <br /> was undertaken in the summer of 1978. Of primary concern were <br /> the detrimental effects by the Mid-Continent Coal Company (now <br /> Mid-Continent Resources, Inc. ) and the Anschultz Coal Company <br /> (now Snowmass Coal Company) to tributaries of the Crystal <br /> River. The secondary purpose was to establish referral data <br /> on this drainage for future monitoring or enforcement and locate <br /> any deleterious situations which would require a more in depth <br /> study. <br /> Summary and Conclusions <br /> 1 . The Crystal River between the town of Crystal and <br /> Redstone is a clean cold water fishery receiving no point <br /> source discharaes. <br /> 2. The Redstone wastewater effluent flow was sO. low or <br /> non-existent that no impact was recognizable in the Crystal <br /> River. , <br /> 3. The entire Crystal River exhibited excellent water <br /> quality except for a few elevated heavy metals concentrations <br /> at stations CR-8 and CR-9. <br /> 4. The Crystal River Fish Hatchery effluent did not pose <br /> a waste loading problem to the Crystal River. <br /> 5. Stations CR-9 and CR-10 had high fecal coliform and <br /> fecal streptococcus counts probably due to cattle grazing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.