My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1991-03-25_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1991-03-25_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2021 11:08:09 PM
Creation date
6/25/2012 2:59:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
3/25/1991
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP) Coal Basin Report
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Recommendations <br /> Allowing the cut banks to naturally slough-in to narrow the road width and stabilize themselves <br /> is a long-term process and not by itself compatible with the short term objectives of controlling <br /> erosion and sediment production. The MLRD permit should be amended to change this prac- <br /> tice. Consensus is needed on appropriate widths of all haul roads and the type of construction <br /> required for ditches. Moving the ditch into the road 10 feet appears arbitrary and requires further <br /> study.In the case of 50-60 foot wide roads with 100 foot cut slopes, it may be necessary to move <br /> J� the ditch into the road 20-30 feet to permanently accommodate the sloughing. In other cases, <br /> �+ the existing stabilized cut slope and ditch should remain undisturbed and the road narrowed <br /> I� 4 by pulling back the outside edge of the road, lessening the fill slope gradient and thereby <br /> t� enhancing its revegetation. Independent of the ditch construction techniques used, all the <br /> eroding ditches should be stabilized by lining them with cobble size rock to reduce water <br /> velocities during periods of runoff and to prevent unnecessary erosion of outer slopes. <br /> Haul Road Berms (Photos 9-10) <br /> Mid-Continent has constructed berms of varying heights and widths on the outer edge of the <br /> 7y haul roads. There is some confusion regarding this practice. Mid-Continent contends that this <br /> is a safety feature required by the Department of Labor, Mine Health and Saftey Administration <br /> on all haul roads. However, according to Lee Smith, (MHSA field representative, pers. comm.), <br /> Mid-Continent has not been required to have these berms due to the issuance of a variance by <br /> U� his agency which allows them to haul on the inside of the roadway. <br /> 1 These constructed berms have several problems associated with them. As the roads are <br /> generally crowned in the middle, drainage from the road flows along the berm. This drainage <br /> (.t concentrates along the berms and its velocity is increased causing the berms and and road <br /> surface to erode. Since no outlets have been included in the berm design, erosion occurs until <br /> L,ir a natural outlet is found or the berm is eroded through. In addition, from Mid-Continent's efforts <br /> to narrow the roads by leaving several feet of road surface on the outer edge of berms have <br /> S resulted in surface erosion. Mid-Continent has failed to revegetate either the berms or the road <br /> surface outside of the berms due to the existing road maintenance practices that continually <br /> add new soil material which covers and enlarges the berms. <br /> Recommendations <br /> As in the case of the haul road ditches,a consensus is needed on road standards.Berms should <br /> be eliminated, unless required for safety under state or federal permits.The berms should then <br /> be designed and constructed as a permanent feature.Under this scenario,the number,size and <br /> type of outlets needed for individual berms should be specified for roads which are administered <br /> under special use permits and federal lease by the Forest Service. Design specifications should <br /> be based on the number of outlets needed to prevent erosion of berms.In addition,the selection <br /> of material needed to line culvert and berm outlets draining onto the fill slopes should be <br /> specified. Existing well-vegetated areas that are located on the outer edges of existing fill slopes <br /> and which could serve as natural sediment filters should also be identified. Revegetation of <br /> berms should be required if existing road maintenance practices can be changed to relocate <br /> disposal of sediment and snow from the berms to an off-site location. Any section of road on <br /> the outside of the berms should be scarified and revegetated. <br /> B. Non-utilized Haul Roads <br /> The issue of what should be done with haul roads that are no longer in use must be addressed. <br /> The current understanding between Mid-Continent and the Forest Service is that roads not <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.