My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (286)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (286)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2020 11:46:38 AM
Creation date
6/25/2012 2:59:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP)
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
p1T OF <br /> TAKES <br /> PRIDE INS <br /> y o United States Department of the Interior AMEKA� <br /> OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING ®�_ % <br /> �4gCH e°9 Reclamation and Enforcement <br /> IN REPLY REFER TO: <br /> Suite 1200 <br /> 505 Marquette Avenue N.W. <br /> Albuquerque,New Mexico 87102 <br /> April 26, 1994 <br /> !7 I") <br /> Mr. Michael B. Long, Director <br /> Division of Minerals and Geology <br /> Department of Natural Resources <br /> 215 Centennial Building <br /> 1313 Sherman Street ("`'y0y <br /> Denver, Colorado 80203 <br /> Re: Mid-Continent Resources Coal Basin Mine (Permit C-81-017) <br /> Dear Mr. Long: <br /> The Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM) has reviewed <br /> your letter of March 15, 1994, and found that several aspects of this letter are of <br /> concern. <br /> I do not agree or consider that the ultimate reclamation plan will most closely align <br /> to the requirements of Title IV rather than Title V. My understanding is that the <br /> reclamation plan is being revised with respect to the roads within the permit area in <br /> accordance with the requirements of the post mining land use envisioned by the <br /> U. S. Forest Service. This is being developed by your staff but still should fall <br /> within the basic requirements-of Title V. -The requirements of Title V cannot be <br /> compromised except for items that would be required under a bond release <br /> situation, such as ponds remaining in place for a minimum of 2 years after <br /> seeding, the 10-year liability period, and the revegetation standards requirements. <br /> These are very limited performance standards which are being waived. <br /> In a meeting between your staff and OSM, it was agreed that Colorado would <br /> include numerous items that were not in the original reclamation plan and that <br /> needed to be done; some of these items are required and some were needed to <br /> ensure hydrological stability. Because these items were in addition to those in the <br /> $3 million reclamation plan, the cost of reclamation should be more than the <br /> $3 million referenced in your letter. <br /> OSM has essentially two Inspectable Units Lists. OSM Directive INE-20 <br /> establishes policy and procedures for selecting and implementing OSM's standard <br /> oversight sample inspection program in primacy States and defines standard <br /> oversight inspectable units as those inspectable units for generating the random <br /> sample inspection list. Standard oversight inspectable units are those on the <br /> Inspectable Units List except (1) coal exploration operations; (2) sites where final <br /> bond release has been granted; (3) abandoned sites or sites officially in any stage <br /> of the bond forfeiture process; and (4) unpermitted sites. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.