Laserfiche WebLink
.i' . <br /> AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM ANALYSIS <br /> FOR SELECTED STREAMS ON THE <br /> f WHITE RIVER NATIONAL FOREST <br /> 1990 <br />*:t.7 <br /> Uh <br /> BACKGROUND AND METHODS <br /> In recent years, land managers on many of our forests and BLM districts in the West have <br /> I.. <br /> improved the stability and reliability of land management plans and decisions by sampling aquatic <br /> organisms, which act as natural monitors of management activities within the drainages on public lands. <br /> During short-term exposure to water of poor quality or adverse changes in habitat,organisms that <br /> I cannot tolerate the stress are destroyed and the aquatic macroinvertebrate community structure changes. <br /> Since aquatic organisms respond to their total environment the can become an effective tool for <br /> 9 g P Y <br /> detection of environmental changes. <br />! ' ; Our analysis of aquatic ecosystems is based upon multiple factors, including: <br /> 1. Various macroinvertebrate data- Community dry-weight biomass/sample expressed in g/ml; <br /> number of individuals per taxa (resident populations); DAT diversity index, which combines a measure <br /> of dominance and number of taxa; habit, habitat, and feeding preferences of individual taxa or species; <br /> specific tolerances of taxa; community composition; and BCI (Biotic Condition Index), which indicates <br /> as a percentage how close an aquatic ecosystem is to its own potential. <br /> 2. Physical parameter data, and <br /> 3. Water chemistry data. <br /> Effective use of the Biotic Condition Index (BCI) depends upon the availability of data on stream <br /> gradient, natural capability of instream substrate (may not be the composition present if man-influenced <br /> -sedimentation is found at the sample station), total alkalinity, and sulfate in mg/l. <br /> Because of the way that macroinvertebrates occupy space within a stream, it generally takes at <br /> least three samples to represent the community accurately at a given station. One sample per station costs C: <br /> less but has little value for aquatic habitat assessment. One never knows if such single samples represent <br /> the best, the worst, or an average of possible conditions at the sampling site. Also as aside benefit, three <br /> s; 1 <br /> t, <br />