My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (280)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (280)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2020 11:38:24 AM
Creation date
6/25/2012 1:45:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP)
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 . Comment The applicant has proposed several different <br /> seed mixtures for seeding of various different disturbed <br /> areas . Most of the seed mixtures contain introduced <br /> species. The use of these introduced species must be <br /> justified pursuant to the requirements of 4 .15. 2 . <br /> Reply The 8 , 000 and 10, 000 Ft. seed mixtures were <br /> gone over with Jim Herron in a meeting of May 26th and <br /> it was decided to delete smooth brome (Bromopsis <br /> inermis) from the seed list and reduce the amount of <br /> timothy to 0 . 5 lbs/ac instead of 3. 0 lbs/ac. Some <br /> timothy was retained even though it is an introduced <br /> species because it is not a noxious species, will <br /> provide quick cover, and will not be so prolific as <br /> to be competitive with natural species . The remainder <br /> of the two seed lists were approved. <br /> Vol . 7 , Chap V, (Add reply statement as Page 34 .1 <br /> and correct table V-G-1 on page 35) . <br /> 7. Comment In Chapter II, Page B-40 , the applicant <br /> states the rock tunnel disposal pile will be seeded <br /> with a grass mixture consisting mostly of introduced <br /> species. Why isn' t the disposal pile going to be <br /> seeded with the 8 , 000 foot elevation seed mix? If the <br /> grass mix is to be the final revegetation mix for the <br /> disposal pile, then the applicant must justify the use <br /> of introduced species. <br /> Reply The rock tunnel construction period began in <br /> 1979 and for the most part is' complete. All of the <br /> areas disturbed during construction received a special <br /> seed mix to insure quick stabilization. (1979-80) From <br /> now on (1981) the 8000' mix as modified in 6 . above <br /> will be used. <br /> 8. Comment The application documents present a confused <br /> description of proposed backfill and grading and reclama- <br /> tion procedures for the extensive surface disturbances <br /> within Coal Basin. The "Steep slope mining" section of <br /> the application, Section II-C, suggests that the <br /> portals will be effectively backfilled to approximate <br /> original contour. However, close scrutiny of text <br /> section V-E and the referenced Exhibits V-E-la through <br /> ld (cross-sections of the five portal areas) determined <br /> that approximate original contour is only proposed for <br /> portals number 1 , 2 and 3. <br /> Reply With respect to approximate original contour <br /> of surface disturbances in Coal Basin see reply 5 - <br /> haul roads AOC. A request for a variance from AOC <br /> based on steep slope mining conditions has been submitted. <br /> Depending on a person' s interpretation of AOC we feel <br /> that mine pads 1 , 2 and 3 will be close to AOC and pads <br /> 4 & 5 will remain intact for post mining use. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.