Laserfiche WebLink
05/16/1995 13: 02 303-782-0390 CDH WQCD WQCC PAGE 03 <br /> Mr.William Goodhard <br /> May 12, 1995 <br /> Page No. 2 <br /> Definition of Ambient <br /> The Division has evaluated your comments coocectung the definition of ambient and we have thought about how to <br /> impose the 520 ug/1 in an efficient manner. The determination as to whether the water quality goal at A-72 is met <br /> should be based on using all of the paired streamflow and zinc concentrations data. At issue here is the need to <br /> determine the criteria to be used to evaluate whether the zinc concentration has increased,decreased,or not changed <br /> at A-72. The Division has established the 85th percentile Zinc concentration standard,based on a simple rank <br /> ordering of the data for stations A-72 and RPS-82,as 520 mg/l. The following is a concept on which we would like <br /> your thoughts. <br /> The existing concentration of zinc is a function of stream flow at A-72. The relationship between stream flow an the <br /> coaceatratian of dissolved zinc shows that 520 ug/l zinc concentration,on average,corresponds to a discharge of 44 <br /> efs which approximates the annual low flow. The attached graph illustrates the variability in the zinc concaatration, <br /> especially at the low flow end of the curve. The flow-concentration"model",rather than a single number,allows use <br /> of the entire data set to evaluate change/no change in zinc concentration at A-72. For example,reduced zinc <br /> concentration would result in most or all of the data points falling below the existing line. Concentrations at a given <br /> flow above the line would indicate a lowering of water quality. This"model"assumes that the percent change in <br /> zinc concentration owing to BMP's and mine closure is uniform throughout the flow range of interest. The loading <br /> analysis done by the Non-Point Source Program for four synoptic events indicates that the load percentage from the <br /> various watersheds is based on a relationship between stream flow and concentration. <br /> It was proposed by SGC that weighing samples to the low flow period on the theory that past sampling was biased <br /> toward high flows. The flow-concentration model makes use of what ever data is obtained. If unusually high now <br /> or low flaw conditions are encountered during the evaluation period,the flow-c000eetration model should be neutral <br /> Moreover,the streamtlow at which 85th percentile zinc concentration is expected to occur should not change, <br /> therefore,the traditional approach-to setting an ambient standard can still be used. We can discuss this further at <br /> our meeting. <br /> VobMry Mitigation PrRoects <br /> The list of mitigation projects is good.We would like to have additional information on the expected loadings to be <br /> removed by the projects. The Division needs to have a better understanding of the information that will be gathered <br /> prior to any remedmon efforts. The Division will want to ensure that there are adequate reviews of the plans and <br /> there is a reasonable amount of information which supports the activities at the sites and that the likelihood for <br /> success is high. Specifically,detailed information as to where and to what extent the Koehler&oagfellow,Gold <br /> Prince,Eureka and South Fork of Cameut Credo dumps and mill tailings will be removed Both the Water Quality <br /> Control Division and the Division of Minerals and Geology roust be involved in the process of design and in the <br /> implementation and final inspection of the A and B projects. <br />