Laserfiche WebLink
Operators representative was advised that the materials are <br /> marginally stocEr.pllfd in a stable configuration. <br /> representative was further advised rf1e operators <br /> respect tc, topsoil afd t'=' ensure that activities with <br /> psc,i 1 removal and stockpiling l i nq are more f carefully <br /> undertaken so that theYe is not a question the same sort of question as to stability• We <br /> north end of the Suety Re fuse Pile <br /> at the the topsoil <br /> Stockpile at the <br /> B bed coal storage area. Pile and the t'='p5�ai1 Stockpile near the <br /> Sediment Pond Ole <br /> At this sediment Pond we observed that the emergency <br /> filled with earth materials such that Its ability to spillway was <br /> discharge would be restricted. fhe s Pass the design <br /> ineffective as a result Of „ spillway was renedered <br /> in tirefect tracks Pond cleaning during the summer of 1986. <br /> from the drag <br /> t��6. �� <br /> l. i.ne used to clean the pond were <br /> evident . As a result the Di -' <br /> representative issued NOV C-87- <br /> Culverts: <br /> We checked numerous culverts during the ins <br /> culvert problems on the Disney Creek ea inspection. et '='refused twc, <br /> disposal area. We observed road near the Suety refuse <br /> below b�erved that the Upper culvert . installed .dust <br /> a switchback, was plugged on the u <br /> crushed on the downslly <br /> P end at the epstream end and was <br /> crest of the road ,=utsl petia_I'he <br /> Operator replaced the culvert and associated fill <br /> the inspection. The second prior to f- _nd culvert . lc'cated below tF�if s the end of <br /> CII.LVPYt on the same road was wi.tchback: <br /> The silting of the discharge pend iof t cuPlulvert <br /> '='n the downstream end. <br /> in Part by a tree fall . t the '=ulsert was at least caused <br /> Silt from the operator removed the fallen tree and <br /> m the culvert prior to <br /> the end of the inspection. <br /> P ti,=,n. <br /> We observed another <br /> sfdQment �,ged culvert at the toe of the Suety refuse <br /> disposal area abovend 021 . We observed that a culvert <br /> draining the toe Of the refuse <br /> Pile through the road was plugged. <br /> This culvert was a / <br /> pparently plugged during 1986 when the refuse pile <br /> toe failure c„_c <br /> urred. The operator attempted to clean the culvert <br /> during the inspection but was not able to cc, <br /> Of the extent of plugging. fhfrffc,rf mplete the task: because <br /> issued NOV r':-87-c� 6. At sediment pond the Division representative <br /> sediment on an inflow t,_, P-nd ���1 we observed a delta of <br /> spillwa the pond Immediately across from the <br /> Y• 1he initial concern was that short-_ <br /> was not being prevented. The operators �'�.r,=��i.tinq r_,f the pond <br /> the inflow p._rators representative indicated that <br /> Provided road drainage relief . the Colorado regulations <br /> at Section 4. 0b, 6 require that short-_extent Possible. In that regard the ,-�,Y�-`�Iting be prevented to the <br /> With respect toroad drainage was addressedncer,� ��Ho short-circuiting <br /> apparent that as a result of the Plugged c :�wever , It was <br /> that drainage from the disposal,-, ulvfrt at the refuse toe <br /> area was entering the pond at the <br /> same intlow as the road drainage. <br /> ,_ Theretorf, the Division <br /> representative inc <br /> luded removal nf +},o <br />