My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1989-12-12_INSPECTION - C1981017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1989-12-12_INSPECTION - C1981017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2021 1:32:06 PM
Creation date
6/22/2012 3:07:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Date
12/12/1989
Doc Name
InspectionReports/ Documents for year 1989
Inspection Date
12/12/1989
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
INSPECTION REPORT Page 1 <br /> October 31 through November 3, 1989 <br /> MidContinent Resources, Inc . <br /> PO Box 500 <br /> Carbondale, Colo <br /> Coal Basin mines <br /> Conditions at the mine during the inspection : much of the upper mine <br /> area was snow covered with some melt occurring during the day; cold & <br /> overcast most of the time with some clearing through the day <br /> Personnel Present During the Inspection : <br /> Lou Ron 'Thompson : MidContinent Resources <br /> Scott Jones : Midcontinent Resources <br /> Bill Crick : Colorado Mined Land Reclamation <br /> Steve Rathbun : OSM, Albuquerque Field Office <br /> Gary Fritz : OSM, Albuquerque Field office, #244 <br /> GENERAL COMMENTS <br /> This was a complete oversight inspection . The State was notified <br /> about my schedule and was able to send their leed inspector for they <br /> mine so he could conduct a Joint inspection with me . <br /> ENFORCEMENT ACTION <br /> The State inspector did riot issue any violations on the mine during <br /> the inspection . tie had some concerns and requested that certain <br /> things be corrected during the inspection but did not take any <br /> enforcement action . The comment was made that he would review his <br /> notes of the inspection in their office and might possibly issue <br /> something at that time . As of the date of this report, the state has <br /> not issued any violations for this inspection . That was confirmed <br /> via a phone conversation with Mr . Crick 's supervisor . <br /> I issued Ten Day Notice #89-02-244-5 to the State for nine <br /> violations noted during the inspection . Violation #1 was issued for <br /> the company' s failure to protect topsoil after it is redistributed . <br /> The company resoiled an additional four acres of the old refuse pile <br /> during the summer of 89, per their certification record of September <br /> 27, 1989 but did not take steps to mulch or seed the area to protect <br /> the soil . The slopes of the waste are now snow covered, rills and <br /> gullies were formed in the resoiled area which indicated soil loss . <br /> The 2nd violation was written for the failure to pass surface <br /> drainage through a sediment pond before leaving the permit area . Two <br /> areas were cited in the violation . The first was drainage off of the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.