My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (262)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (262)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2020 11:08:18 AM
Creation date
6/21/2012 10:47:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP) Backfilling and Grading Plan for Preparation Plant Area
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-33- <br /> Both North Thompson Creek and Middle Thompson Creek exhibit similar <br /> baseline characteristics. Total dissolved solids content is low, <br /> generally between 100 and 300 mg/l . Suspended solids content is also <br /> low, except during snowmelt situations or thunderstorm events. <br /> The Fourmile Creek drainage also exhibits good water quality. Total <br /> dissolved solids concentrations average 150 mg/l , while total suspended <br /> solids concentrations normally fall below 100 mg/l . For comparisons of <br /> selected water quality characteristics, please refer to Table 3. <br /> Probable Hydrologic Consequences - Surface 'dater <br /> The Coal Basin mine plan is designed to minimize the impacts on the <br /> surface water hydrology of the area. Mid-Continent has designed and <br /> constructed water control structures and closed water use systems to <br /> mitigate adverse impacts on the hydrologic balance. For more information <br /> on the drainage control plan, see Appendix II-8-7 in Volume 3 of the <br /> application and Section V of this document. <br /> The hydrologic consequences of mining in Coal Basin are expected to be <br /> minimal . The applicant' s statement of probable hydrologic consequences <br /> on page 22.1 of Chapter IV, Volume 7, predicted no affect on the quantity <br /> and quality of surface water other than increased sediment loading, but <br /> provided no supporting discussion. Therefore, the following is the <br /> Division' s assessment based upon information contained in the permit <br /> application in Volumes 4, 5, and 7. <br /> The Coal Basin mine plan is designed to minimize impacts on the surface <br /> water hydrology of the region. Drainage from all disturbed areas is <br /> routed through one or more of 21 sedimentation ponds. Based on <br /> information presented by the applicant, there should be no effects on <br /> surface water quality from sediment pond discharge near the mines. Total <br /> dissolves solids, major ions, and metal contents are all similar to the <br /> receiving stream levels. However, discharge from the sediment ponds near <br /> the preparations plant will have an effect on water quality. Discharge <br /> from the sediment ponds at the preparations plant increases the soluble <br /> salt conten-t—by-an average of 8 mg/l . <br /> The metal content of the discharge and total suspended solids are low!be]d. <br /> than the receiving stream. This will not lower seater quality. The <br /> release of sediment deficient waters into Coal Creek should not creat <br /> any additional drnyncutting because of the rocky nature of the stream <br /> additional points where soluble sal s are added to the surface 'water <br /> system are the nine t and seepage along Coal Creek from <br /> the refuse pile. The refuse pi e' seepage is the only additive source of <br /> metals at the mine site. The i on content of Coal Creek is increased by <br /> 0- l ' m9/1 which should have an insignificant effect on water Quality. <br /> Seepage from the refuse pile also incre ,,Pc tip col:,ole salt y <br /> concentration by an average df ' 4 Ynicr is also insignificant. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.