Laserfiche WebLink
6 - <br /> 301 , L.S . Wood No. 3 mine. Point TP-4 , which has subsided <br /> but is nearly stable (-0. 06 feet of movement between Sep- <br /> tember of 1984 and August of 1985) , is located directly <br /> ahead (north) of the longwall 301 tailgate; mining ceased <br /> in early 1981 . TP-2 , which has not subsided, is located <br /> northwest of the headgate of the abandoned 301 face, and <br /> MC-8 , which also has not subsided, is southwest of the <br /> headgate entries 350 feet back from the face (exact loca- <br /> tions are given below) . Using the same methods as above, <br /> except that the elevation of the intersection of H with <br /> the surface was taken from topographic maps, for TP-4 H is <br /> 2 ,265 feet, angle 0 is 36 . 33 , and x is 340 feet, giving <br /> an apparent angle of draw of 13 . 02 . For TP-2 , H is also <br /> (by coincidence) 2 ,265 feet, 0 is 30 .45 , and x ec-uals 820 <br /> feet, for an apparent angle of draw of 25 . 97 . Finally, <br /> for MC-8 , H is 2 ,530 feet, 0 equals 25 .57 , and x is 790 <br /> feet, for an apparent angle of draw of 20 . 99 . From this <br /> data it is cle$r that the actual angle of draw is between <br /> 13 . 0° and 21 . 0. <br /> In summary, adjacent to an active mining area, the angle of <br /> draw appears to be approximately 16 .5 , in an area of tight <br /> control. Adjacent to an area that has not been worked for <br /> over 5 years and that now appears to be almost stable, where <br /> data points are admittedly less concentrated, the angle of <br /> draw is between 130 and 21 . Given this information, it <br /> would appear that the angle of draw stipulated by CMLRD is <br /> too conservative. The actual angle of draw is proba lv ' <br /> the vicinity of 18 . sing this ang e, mle-a-surable subsidence <br /> "MMM be explected from 400 to 815 feet from the edge of <br /> mined-out areas, assuming slopes angles from 0 to 450 and <br /> an average depth of cover of 2 ,500 feet. <br /> In conclusion, based on actual subsidence monitoring data <br /> obtained since the baseline survey in 1981 , the maximum verti- <br /> cal subsidence above the Coal Basin underground workings <br /> should not exceed 7 .2 feet. These data also indicate that <br /> the actual angle of draw is approximately 18 , which could <br /> result in measureable subsidence effects from 400 to 815 <br /> feet horizontally from the edge of mined-out areas . <br /> 4 . Description of damage or diminuation of reasonably fore- <br /> seeable use of structures and renewable resource lands which <br /> could result from subsidence . The only structures currently <br /> located above mined-out areas consist of mine ventilation <br /> fans and associated facilities , such as access roads and <br /> power lines. All of these facilities are located above areas <br /> mined out years ago (in most cases over 20 years) and assumed <br /> to be stable. Most of these structures have been in place <br /> for a number of years and no subsidence damage has been noted. <br /> Other man-made features are limited to light-duty roads on the <br /> surface , and the M bed mine workings over mined-out areas in <br /> the B bed. Given the apparent plastic yield of near-surface <br />