My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (239)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (239)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2020 10:24:14 AM
Creation date
6/20/2012 11:20:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP) 1982 Technical Revisions Rock Tunnel Trash Pile
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
169
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-56- <br /> Memo to Candace Thompson <br /> Coal Basin TR - Sutey Pile Phase II <br /> page 2 <br /> The coal processing waste structure is founded on an assemblage of <br /> low-permeability alluvial and colluvial surficial materials adjoining Coal <br /> Creek. As a result of its preliminary adequacy review of Phase I of the Sutey <br /> Coal Refuse Structure, the Division expressed a concern that low-permeability <br /> foundation materials might undergo an undrained failure, if loading rates <br /> exceeded those materials' ability to drain and consolidate. The applicant had <br /> not performed effective stress triaxial strength testing on the foundational <br /> materials and could not derive the parameters necessary to complete a <br /> sophisticated undrained effective stress analysis of the foundational <br /> materials beneath the proposed pile. As an alternative, the amended static <br /> slope stability analysis was based on a worst case assumption of instantaneous <br /> application of the entire structure's five year configuration load. Utilizing <br /> this worst case assumption, the amended analysis demonstrated, to the <br /> Division's satisfaction, that the proposed coal processing waste pile's <br /> foundation will provide adequate support under realistic anticipated rates of <br /> loading. This demonstration applies to the Phase II expansion of the <br /> structure. <br /> cc: Mike Long <br /> Doc. No: 0463F <br /> JP/jp <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.