My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (248)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (248)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2020 10:45:19 AM
Creation date
6/20/2012 8:43:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP) 1992 Correspondence
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-2- <br /> According to surveys performed in 1991, the following <br /> topsoil is available in storage areas : <br /> CUBIC <br /> LOCATION YARDS TONS <br /> Main Sutey stockpile 65,600 69,077 <br /> New Sutey stockpile 24,000 25, 272 <br /> Sutey access road 2, 500 2, 632 <br /> Tunnel ponds 1, 270 1, 337 <br /> Tunnel refuse pile 2, 100 2, 211 <br /> #1 Mine ponds upper 106 112 <br /> #1 Mine ponds lower 70 74 <br /> #5 Mine pond 254 267 <br /> Bathhouse 1, 110 1, 169 <br /> Overland conveyor 8, 300 8, 740 <br /> TOTAL 105, 310 110, 891 <br /> It appears that there could be a deficit of up to 44, 487 <br /> cubic yards ( 46,844 tons) of topsoil . However, since the <br /> topsoil demand is thought to be a maximum, the actual <br /> deficit will be smaller . In addition, there are areas close <br /> to the sites where there is now little or no topsoil <br /> stockpiled, specifically the mine pads, from which <br /> additional topsoil can be "borrowed" at less expense than <br /> hauling it from the lower stockpiles . These areas are the <br /> beaver pond area below the No. 3 Mine bin; an area north of <br /> the old Coal Basin townsite adjacent to the No. 5 Mine road; <br /> the hillside north of the old training building adjacent to <br /> the No. 2 Mine bin site; and several small locations along <br /> the No. 4 Mine road . These locations are thought to contain <br /> sufficient soil thicknesses to allow removal of the amounts <br /> necessary as well as their own subsequent reclamation. <br /> It should also be noted that there is considerable rich <br /> topsoil in the shallow bowls above No. 4 Mine, along the <br /> road to the top of Huntsman Ridge. <br /> Clearly, if more than 6 inches of topsoil is required, if <br /> road surfaces and/or downslopes must be covered, and/or if <br /> the mine pad downslopes must be covered, more "borrowing" <br /> will be required, increasing the areas that will have to be <br /> disturbed . Specifically, if the old and Sutey refuse piles <br /> require 12 inches instead of 6, an additional 48, 239 cubic <br /> yards (50,795 tons ) will be needed; if the requirement is 18 <br /> inches, 72, 358 cubic yards ( 76, 193 tons) would have to be <br /> excavated from somewhere in the basin. To put this in some <br /> perspective, the volume of the latter would be that of a <br /> square football field ( 100 yards on a side) almost 23 feet <br /> high. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.