My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1994-10-19_HYDROLOGY - M1977378
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M1977378
>
1994-10-19_HYDROLOGY - M1977378
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2021 8:25:34 PM
Creation date
6/20/2012 7:48:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977378
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
10/19/1994
Doc Name
Cement Creek Conjunctive Flow Characterization
From
Golder Associates
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
August 1994 -11- 933-2713.003 <br /> overlying a layer of clayey gravel. The lower clayey gravel unit exhibits a low permeability, <br /> indicating that this unit acts as an aquitard. Therefore, the groundwater is inferred to flow <br /> predominantly in the sandy gravel zone. The groundwater portion of conjunctive flow was <br /> determined to be significantly less than surface water flow in Cement Creek, even at low flow <br /> conditions and under the most unrealistically conservative conditions. <br /> Section 5.2 demonstrates that the lowest surface water flow is about 250 times higher than the <br /> reasonable estimate of groundwater flow presented above, and is about 45 times higher than the <br /> unrealistically conservative estimate of groundwater flow. High surface water flow is about <br /> 15,000 times higher than the reasonable estimate of groundwater flow and is about 2,500 times <br /> higher than the unrealistically conservative estimate of groundwater flow. These data suggest <br /> that groundwater flow is approximately 0.4% of the total conjunctive flow even during low-flow <br /> periods and therefore does not significantly affect the volume of conjunctive flow. <br /> Based on the results of conjunctive flow analysis, no further groundwater monitoring is <br /> recommended. Even under unrealistically conservative conditions, groundwater flow remains <br /> an insignificant portion of the total conjunctive flow in Cement Creek. Accordingly, monitoring <br /> of surface water flow in Cement Creek is sufficient to determine effects of adit plugging on the <br /> total flow in the creek. <br /> 6.0 REFERENCES <br /> Bouwer, H., and Rice, R.C., (1976). A slug test for determining the hydraulic conductivity of <br /> confined aquifers with partially penetrating wells. Water Resources Research, Vol. 12, <br /> No. 3, 423-428. <br /> Hvorslev, J. (1951) Time Lag and Soil Permeability in Groundwater Observations, Bulletin No. <br /> 36 Waterways Experiment Station, Corps of Engineers, U.S. Army, Vicksburg, <br /> Mississippi. <br /> Golder Associates <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.