My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1994-10-19_HYDROLOGY - M1977378
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M1977378
>
1994-10-19_HYDROLOGY - M1977378
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2021 8:25:34 PM
Creation date
6/20/2012 7:48:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977378
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
10/19/1994
Doc Name
Cement Creek Conjunctive Flow Characterization
From
Golder Associates
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
August 1994 -6- 933-2713.003 <br /> 4.2.2 Results <br /> The slug test analysis for wells A-1 (BH-5), A-2 (BH-6), B-1 (BH-1) and B-2 (BH-2) are <br /> presented in Appendix B, and the results are summarized in Table 2. <br /> In some cases the slug test data did not fall on a clearly definable straight line or it was possible <br /> to fit more than one straight line to the data. Where the data did not fall on a clearly definable <br /> straight line,judgment was used to determine a fit which would provide a hydraulic conductivity <br /> value which best reflected the formation. For example, the very early data probably reflect the <br /> properties of the sand pack; the very late data often are at the limit of the transducer resolution. <br /> Very early and late data are generally not included in the analysis. <br /> Table 2 provides 'best estimates' of hydraulic conductivity for each piezometer. Where two <br /> lines were fitted to the data, the 'best estimate' is either the average of the two results, or the <br /> one considered to be most representative of the formation. <br /> The two analysis methods often gave similar results for a given test, despite their differing <br /> assumptions about confining conditions. The similarity in results provides a high degree of <br /> confidence in the hydraulic conductivity values. <br /> The rising head results for B-l(BH-1) did not fall on a clearly definable straight line, and <br /> judgement could not reasonably be used to approximate a straight line. Accordingly, rising head <br /> data for B-1 (BH-1) were not used in determining a representative hydraulic conductivity for the <br /> Cement Creek sediments. This has no significant effect on the results obtained or the conclusion <br /> drawn. <br /> The best estimate of hydraulic conductivity of 4.9 x 10 -5 cm/s for the sandy gravel formation <br /> is the average of the best estimates for piezometers A-1 (BH-5), A-2 (BH-6) and B-1 (BH-1). <br /> Based on the slug test results, the hydraulic conductivity of the sandy gravel ranges from 3.4 <br /> x 10' cm/s to 2.8 x 10' cm/s. <br /> Golder Associates <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.