Laserfiche WebLink
DEC. 3 '98 10:15AM DMG,GJCT 1 303 2410336 P.5 <br /> social benefits . Planning was done with public input' , <br /> and in consultaCion with the interested local govern- <br /> ment units . <br /> The alternatives conhidered include : <br /> 1) Existing management direction. <br /> 2) Maximum development of inventoricd winter <br /> sports sites _ <br /> 3) Maximum development of wood products , water <br /> yield and dispersed recreation, with increased <br /> emphasis on livestock forage . <br /> 4) Maximum development of livestock forage, wood <br /> products , water yield and wildlife values , <br /> increasing emphasis on controlling vehicular <br /> access . <br /> 5) Maximum development of tivestock forage. <br /> increased emphasis toward non-development <br /> with fewer commodity outputs. <br /> 6) Maximum development of livestock forage. <br /> Emphasis directed toward non-development. <br /> The alternative selected (maximum development <br /> of livestock forage , wood products , water yield and <br /> dispensed recreation, with increasing emphasis on <br /> controlling vehicular access) wn5 rhnsan because : <br /> "It provides for a balance between commodity <br /> outputs , environmental conditions and social values . <br /> It best meets the goals and 'broad objectives as join ly <br /> derived among local citizens , county govcrnmenL , and <br /> the Forest Service . '' <br /> Source: Thompson Creek land Use Plan U. S . F. S . <br /> The selected mauagcmcnt plan prnvides the following : <br /> -Protects and enhances wildlife habitat by cunLrnlling <br /> access into Middle Thompson and Ocuth Branch Creeks , <br /> -Permits intensive timber management prArtices Lu <br /> -3- <br />