My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (229)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (229)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2020 10:05:53 AM
Creation date
6/19/2012 2:58:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP) 1999 Correspondence
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
F. The Lawsuit was commenced by plaintiffs against MCR and the Trustee for <br /> payment of property taxes accruing on property owned by MCR in Pitkin County. Those claims <br /> have previously been resolved and all outstanding property taxes due and owing have been paid. <br /> G. MCR and the Trustee asserted a third-party claim for an accounting against DMG <br /> and later amended their Third Party Complaint to add additional claims against DMG. Third- <br /> Party plaintiff MidCon Realty moved to intervene and filed additional claims against DMG. <br /> DMG raised several affirmative defenses to MCR's, the Trustee's and MidCon's claims and <br /> asserted a counterclaim against the Trustee. Pitkin County moved to be realigned as a third-party <br /> defendant and pursuant to Court Order was allowed to become a third-party defendant as to one <br /> of the claims asserted by MCR. <br /> H. MCR's, the Trustee's and MidCon's third-party claims generally arose out of <br /> MCR's, the Trustee's and MidCon's dissatisfaction with reclamation being performed in Coal <br /> Basin by DMG. DMG disagrees with the third-party plaintiffs' assertions concerning its <br /> reclamation at Coal Basin. <br /> 1. MCR's Second Amended Plan of Liquidation approved by the bankruptcy court <br /> called for funding in the amount of$3 million to perform reclamation in Coal Basin less certain <br /> credits. <br /> I DMG is entering into and executing this Settlement Agreement with authority and <br /> consent from the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board. <br /> K. The parties to this Agreement being all the parties to the lawsuit have now <br /> resolved all claims between them and therefore, for good and valuable consideration, enter into <br /> this Settlement Agreement as follows: <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.