My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (228)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (228)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2020 10:04:01 AM
Creation date
6/19/2012 2:57:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP) TDN 98-140-116-001
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE. OF COLORADO <br /> •DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br /> D,•p,trtment of Natural Resources PMP, Wt <br /> 131 1 Sherman St., Room 215 <br /> Denver,Colorado 80203 <br /> Phone"(103)866-3567 <br /> FAX (W3)832-8106 <br /> DEPARTMENT OF <br /> NATURAL <br /> RESOURCES <br /> March 30, 1998 Roy Romer <br /> Governor <br /> James S Lochhead <br /> Mr.Jim Fulton Executive Director <br /> wLchael B.Long <br /> Office of Surface Mining and Reclamation Enforcement Division Director <br /> 1999 Broadway, Suite 1320 <br /> Denver, CO 80202-5733 <br /> RE: Ten Day Notice X-98-140-1 16-001 <br /> Mid Continent Resources Coal Basin Mine <br /> Permit No. C-81-017 (Revoked) <br /> Dear Mr. Fulton: <br /> This letter serves as the Division of Minerals and Geology's ("the Division") response to the <br /> above referenced TDN. The TDN alleges a violation of Colorado Rule 3.04.2(6). That rule <br /> states, <br /> "if the amount of bond is insufficient to pay for the full cost of reclamation, the permittee <br /> shall be liable for the balance. The Division may complete necessary reclamation to the <br /> extent the forfeited funds permit and recover from the permittee, by means of civil <br /> proceedings and remedies all reclamation costs in excess of the forfeited amount to <br /> complete the remaining reclamation." <br /> The Division has held the permittee liable for the cost of reclamation, as evidenced by on-going <br /> civil proceedings. At this time, necessary reclamation is being completed with the forfeited <br /> bond funds. The Division is ensuring that the provisions of Rule 3.04.2(6) are enforced. <br /> Therefore, as further explained below, we contend that the alleged violation does not exist and, <br /> that the civil actions taken by the Division constitute good cause for not taking corrective <br /> measures in response to this Ten Day Notice. <br /> The Division provided an update of the status of on-the-ground reclamation efforts and civil <br /> proceedings in a memo to Mr. Mitch Rollings dated January 5, 1998. A copy of that memo is <br /> encloses. Please refer to pages 2 and 3 of that memo for a summary of civil proceedings taken <br /> to secure funds for reclamation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.