My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (218)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (218)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2020 9:48:45 AM
Creation date
6/19/2012 11:11:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP)
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
188
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
in«snounzainoi�, <br /> MEMO <br /> TO: Doug Bowman, Wayne Cook, Jim Herron <br /> FROM: Tom Colbert <br /> DATE: 5-11-84 <br /> RE: Meeting with MLR re Mid-Continent's proposed waste disposal area — <br /> vegetation baseline survey. <br /> On Friday, May U, 1984, Tom Colbert and Wayne Cook of IMS met with Brian <br /> Munson and Jim Herron of MLR at MLR's office. The purpose of the meeting <br /> was to go over specific requirements and proposed methods for conducting a <br /> vegetation baseline inventory for the area proposed by Mid-Continent to be <br /> developed as a disposal site for coal processing waste. The following <br /> summarizes the points of discussion: <br /> 1) Doing the inventory in late July or early August will be about the best <br /> time. It is imperative that grazing livestock be excluded from the area at least <br /> until after all sampling work is finished. There may be some concern by Mid- <br /> Continent regarding their development schedule: MLR is not going to allow <br /> disturbance of the area (except for conveyor assembly) until baseline studies <br /> have been completed and approved. <br /> 2) Baseline information on aspen type is already adequate. IMS will conduct <br /> an "ocular reconnaissance" survey of aspen areas within the inventory study <br /> area, but quantitative sampling will not be required. <br /> 3) Two or three communities in addition to aspec may occur on the site. IMS <br /> will use its best judgment in identifying and delineating plant communities. <br /> Mapping resolution will be less than 2.5 acres. Inclusions or stringers will be <br /> dealt with as deemed appropriate. If there are any questions, don't hesitate to <br /> call Jim Herron. <br /> 4) Cluster (stratified) sampling is OK (see Cook and Bonham publication on <br /> techniques for vegetation measurement, C.S.U. Range Science Dept. Science <br /> Series No. 28 for a detailed discussion). A two-tail "t" test will be used for <br /> statistical calculations. Shrub types will be sampled to detect +10% of the <br /> mean at 80% confidence; herbaceous types to +10% of the mean at 90% <br /> confidence. Shrub types are defined as the communities having at least 15% <br /> relative vegetation cover comprised by the shrub stratum. MLR will allow <br /> cutoff at 50 samples, if they approve of the mapping. <br /> 5) Vegetation cover wil be measured by the line-intercept method. Data will <br /> be collected by species for herbaceous and shrub strata. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.