My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (218)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (218)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2020 9:48:45 AM
Creation date
6/19/2012 11:11:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP)
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
188
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�ti OF COIO? <br /> 9 <br /> p DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br /> * * David H.Getches,Executive Director <br /> MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br /> 86 D"ID C.SHELTON, Director <br /> Richard D.Lamm <br /> Governor <br /> Y <br /> DATE: August 9, 1984 <br /> TO: Jim Herron I <br /> FROM: Jim Pendleton <br /> RE: Adequacy Resp se id-Continent Resources, Inc's. Permit Revision <br /> Application - Coal Processing Waste Disposal Structure <br /> Pursuant to your request, I have reviewed the geotechnically-related portions <br /> of the application amendments submitted in response to our earlier adequacy <br /> comments regarding the proposal to construct an underground development waste <br /> pile on the Sutey parcel . My adequacy comments were submitted to you in two <br /> documents; my original memo to you of June 27, 1984, and a supplemental memo <br /> to you of July 12, 1984. <br /> My original memo of June 27, 1984 contained three deficiencies requiring <br /> resolution: <br /> (1) I requested the completion of a pseudo-static slope stability <br /> analysis. The applicant has properly amended Section H of the <br /> application to include an appropriate pseudo-static analysis. That <br /> analysis applied an acceleration factor of .05g, resulting in a minimum <br /> pseudo-static safety factor of 1 .3 for the pile, which is acceptable. <br /> (2) I requested a brief contingency reclamation plan be prepared for <br /> implementation in the event that construction of the pile were to cease <br /> after the five year configuration had been achieved. The amended <br /> application presents an acceptable reclamation description for the <br /> contingency situation and should facilitate the necessary bonding <br /> determinations. <br /> (3) The certification statement contained on the cover page of Section G of <br /> the permit revision application lacked the signature of the certifying <br /> professional . Unfortunately, that signature is still missing and will <br /> require execution prior to approval of the permit revision application. <br /> 423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.