My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1993-04-27_REVISION - M1977378 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977378
>
1993-04-27_REVISION - M1977378 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2021 8:06:48 AM
Creation date
6/15/2012 6:41:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977378
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
4/27/1993
Doc Name
Response
From
John F. Abel, Jr.
To
Sunnyside Gold Corp
Type & Sequence
TR14
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
L.R. Perino Page 8 April 27, 1993 <br /> The 3000 psi design strength (fc) concrete cannot support <br /> 20000 psi. An irregularity with the height of 0.15 in would <br /> result in 3000 psi in radial compression across the tunnel, as <br /> follows: <br /> Cc = (0.15/[13 (12) ) )106 = 962 micro-strain <br /> Ec = 0.000962 (3120000) = 3000 psi <br /> The frictional resistance to sliding of rock on concrete would <br /> increase as the irregularity induced radial stress increased. At <br /> the design 3000 psi maximum radial stress the frictional <br /> resistance to sliding would be approximately 1950 psi. This <br /> calculation is based on Kvapil 's tabulation of friction factors <br /> (1965, p 284) for selected rock on concrete and the use of a <br /> conservative coefficient of friction of 0. 65, see Table 1. <br /> Garrett and Campbell-Pitt (1961, p 1287-1289) presented two <br /> South African bulkhead design procedures, one based on shear <br /> strength and the other on compression strength. The shear <br /> strength design method, which involves a more conservative <br /> punching shear design for bulkheads, relies on the shear strength <br /> of either the concrete or the rock, whichever is smaller. This is <br /> basically the method employed in calculating the shear strength of <br /> the rock-concrete contact for the Sunnyside Mine bulkheads. The <br /> other compressive strength design method relies on the natural <br /> rock surface irregularities to transmit the applied thrust to the <br /> adjacent rock. The compressive design strength recommended is, <br /> "the safe compressive stress of the concrete or rock, whichever is <br /> the lesser". They assume a mean irregularity angle of 450, i.e. <br /> joints and fractures producing tunnel wall irregularity are <br /> possible at any angle from parallel to normal to the tunnel axis, <br /> that half of the potential compression bearing surfaces face <br /> upstream and half downstream and that the downstream facing joint <br /> surfaces carry no compressive load. The compressive design <br /> strength method almost always produces a shorter, less <br /> conservative, bulkhead design length in the situation where the <br /> rock compression strength is greater than the concrete compression <br /> strength. This results because the design shear strength of <br /> concrete is approximately 5 to 10 percent of the minimum design <br /> rock cohesion, i.e. rock shear strength. The concrete design <br /> compression strength is normally more than 10 percent of the rock <br /> compression strength. The specific Sunnyside Mine design <br /> conditions are, as follows: <br /> Concrete design compression strength (fc) = 3000 psi <br /> Minimum latite compression strength (UC) = 10000 psi <br /> :. Concrete compression strength < 30% of latite strength <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.