My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1993-05-26_REVISION - M1977378
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977378
>
1993-05-26_REVISION - M1977378
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 11:24:25 AM
Creation date
6/15/2012 6:41:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977378
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
5/26/1993
Doc Name
Reclamation Issues
From
Welborn Dufford Brown & Tooley, P.C.
To
CDH-WQCD
Type & Sequence
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WELBORN DUFFORD BROWN & TOOLEY, P.C. <br /> Mr . J. David Holm <br /> May 26, 1993 <br /> Page Three <br /> plug would cut off approximately 2/3 of the mine water <br /> presently flowing from the American Tunnel, and is expected to <br /> create an effective seal with minimal, if any, seepage around <br /> that seal . This is the point to which Sunnyside Gold has <br /> requested that its NPDES discharge point be moved upon <br /> completion of the plugging. <br /> The plug in the American Tunnel is proposed in a <br /> location of stable and competent rock and will dam the <br /> naturally in-flowing ground water. The water level in the mine <br /> workings behind the plug will rise until an equilibrium is <br /> reached between water moving toward the mine workings and water <br /> moving away from the flooded mine workings through naturally <br /> occurring fractures in the rock. Due to the physical and <br /> chemical characteristics of the ground water and wall rock, the <br /> water behind the proposed plug is expected to be better than <br /> the water which currently discharges from the American Tunnel <br /> prior to treatment. In effect, installation of the plugs is <br /> expected to return the hydrologic system to an approximation of <br /> the natural, pre-mining conditions . <br /> As a result, over time water which previously <br /> entered the mine workings will likely find its way through <br /> natural structures to surface. In our view, such waters would <br /> not constitute point source discharges. Rather, they would be <br /> a return to the historic natural conditions of hydrologic <br /> flow. Additionally, there would be no discharge of pollutants, <br /> or addition of pollutants, by any activity of man. Whatever <br /> the natural constituents of the water moving through the <br /> geologic environment, that would reflect the historic natural <br /> conditions . Therefore, C.R.S. 25-8-501 and the statutory <br /> definitions of "discharge of pollutants" , "point source" , <br /> "pollutant" , and "pollution" would not require an NPDES permit <br /> for any surface springs or seeps which occur. We request the <br /> Division' s confirmation of that status . <br /> Additionally, if water backed up sufficiently, there <br /> is a theoretical possibility that it could exit from historic <br /> mine workings such as the Mogul Mine. If additional water were <br /> to flow from that historic portal, it would be primarily from <br /> the reversal of hydraulic gradient to the historical flow <br /> path. The Simon Hydro-Search report (dated March 12, 1993, <br /> S S 8 .2 and 8 .3) estimates that, after 16 years from plugging, <br /> only about 4 gpm would flow from the Mogul Mine after flowing <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.