My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1991-12-08_REVISION - C1981017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1991-12-08_REVISION - C1981017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2021 2:50:15 PM
Creation date
6/14/2012 12:55:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
12/8/1991
Doc Name
Multiple Documents
Type & Sequence
TR20
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J. <br /> A design for, and calculations as the required size for a berm at <br /> the 016 topsoil pile, have been included with Attachment 1 for <br /> placement in the permit. The topsoil pile itself is well <br /> vegetated, and surrounded on all but the west side by a well <br /> vegetated and large area of undisturbed, fairly level ground. <br /> Also, an area of rocks forms a natural berm near the base of the <br /> topsoil pile. <br /> our objective in placing the berms along the west side is to ensure <br /> that any run-off from the west side of the topsoil pile is <br /> directed into the sediment pond. The road already slopes toward <br /> the pond, so the berm is essentially an added assurance. <br /> We believe any runoff would be successfully directed to the pond, <br /> and that the sampling procedure discussed previously for a total <br /> containment berm concept, which is in lieu of a sediment pond, <br /> would not apply or be required in this case. A diagram showing the <br /> berms, and calculations as to appropriate sizing, are included in <br /> Attachment 1. <br /> For that reason, we , question whether a small area exemption is <br /> actually required here, and believe that sampling for storm events <br /> (proposed in the original submittal) would not be necessary, as the <br /> runoff is going to the sediment pond, which is sampled. <br /> Yours truly, \\ <br /> Diane Delaney <br /> Mid-Continent Resources <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.