My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1992-06-05_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1992-06-05_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2021 7:36:44 AM
Creation date
6/14/2012 9:08:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
6/5/1992
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP)
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
09 <br /> inaRnounrain.No& <br /> MIEMO <br /> To: George are, Recstone Corp. <br /> From: TOM Colert <br /> Date. jaruary t C. 1, 985 <br /> Re. 't4`ooay ^Far' rdonci,T_ir 4 rt,,er !.os "as r i; <br /> exploi L on r.^_.ac <br /> t <br /> ;-,, veaetat fer!i Co''':?mt ''le rvua ierr�.nur i�:�v�� mar.,Der-, <br /> and samolea in the original vegetation, Daseline inventor; none severa, <br /> years ago by WRD. IThe area encompassing toe road ccrridcr was mapped as <br /> Dart of this invent as the spruce/fir parKlana vegetation type. The <br /> road corridor area was not sampled, nowever. But a considerable area of <br /> this vegetation typewas sampled in the original inventory and a reference <br /> area was establishd. Therefore, information contained in the Coal Basin <br /> Mine permit application already includes quite a bit of information about <br /> this vegetation typ _ Sample adequacy was achieved for this vegetation <br /> type in the original vegetation inventory. <br /> Tnis situation is exactly the same as the situation with the aspen <br /> vegetation type atlthe Sutey property. in that case, the Division deemed <br /> it not to be necessary to re-sample this type completely There should be <br /> no reason to do it for the proposed road either. (See MaD I I i-H-2 of the <br /> permit application.) <br /> r, <br /> According, to 0-3�jcy of tne (liviclnn <br /> not required for communities where woody plant .over is less than ? <br /> percent. The measured cover for woody species for the das well <br /> exploration road is only 7.4 percent. Altnough tree canopy cover was- <br /> not measured, it i� likely that combined woody plant overstory ano <br /> understory cover is less than l S percent for the qas well exploration <br /> road area by itself (the spruce/fir Darklana type considered over the <br /> entire inventoried area does nave woody plant cover greater than '5 <br /> percent). The original vegetation baseline inventory states that <br /> con ifers..."although visually dominant...contriDuted only 2.5 Dercent <br /> cover, owing to tree patchiness of their distribution." Tnerefore, the <br /> necessity of woody plant density samplinq at all is doubtful, according to <br /> the Division's own d�eaetation <br /> finition of a woody vegetation type, if the inventory <br /> of the road corridor were to stand alone. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.