My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1999-05-14_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1999-05-14_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2021 7:45:20 PM
Creation date
6/13/2012 9:06:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
5/14/1999
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP)
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
achievement of successful revegetation in conformance with permit-mandated <br /> standarcW appears feasible. <br /> COMMENTS ON 15 JULY 1998 LETTER FROM GREG LEWICKI &ASSOCIATES <br /> The following are comments regarding the numbered points set forth in the letter of 15 <br /> July 1998 from Greg Lewicki &Associates (GLA) regarding an evaluation that Mr. <br /> Lewicki had made of revegetation at Coal Basin. Only those that I have some basis for <br /> comment are included. <br /> GLA Comment No. 2 <br /> Response: Regarding the use of straw mulch, it is one of the most economical means <br /> of addressing the need for mulch. If the point of the objection to methods of <br /> revegetation at Coal Basin is cost, questioning the use of perhaps the cheapest <br /> material available seems illogical. It is true that straw is moved by wind and that under <br /> ideal conditions, it is desirable to hold it down by some means. Again, if this were a <br /> flatlands project, the anchoring of straw that could proceed would result in a more <br /> effective mulch cover. However, the slopes involved on much of the Coal Basin site <br /> are too steep for the usual crimping equipment to operate and the limited benefit of the <br /> mulch is all that can be realized. <br /> The effectiveness of straw on the steep slopes at the Coal Basin site will be limited to <br /> locations where the straw lodges and resists the winds. Under ideal circumstances, <br /> applied mulch would remain evenly in place across the entire revegetation area. <br /> However, the windy conditions at high altitude would make this difficult to achieve in <br /> any case, and the steepness and inaccessibility of the slopes involved at Coal Basin <br /> make it impossible to apply materials or use equipment-that might reduce the amount-of., <br /> wind redistribution of straw. Despite the loss 7 ,of the straw applied, som s� -- <br /> benefit accrues, and contributes to the establishment of vegetation. <br /> Mine #4 Downslope Revegetation Work <br /> GLA Comment No. 3 <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.