Laserfiche WebLink
Mid-Continent Report; Nov. 15, 1993 <br /> Steve Renner/Harry Posey <br /> Page 4 <br /> About half of the low flow season occurs in warm weather, and warm water generally <br /> increases the solubility of solids. The effect of temperature on solubility is probably minor <br /> relative to the effects of time that the water spends in contact with the minerals. <br /> 3b. Conductivity and IDS versus time. Conductivity averages about 500 and TDS averages <br /> about 250. However, the highest conductivity and the highest TDS occur from late 1987 <br /> through late 1992. <br /> 3c. Conductivity and TDS versus flow. Conductivity and TDS both show an inverse <br /> exponential relationship with flow. High Cond and TDS correlate with low flow. <br /> 4a. TSS. Most of the high TSS concentrations occur during lowest flows. The cause is not <br /> perfectly known, but is probably related to the installation of sediment retention ponds <br /> around the mid-1980s. The most plausible explanation is that slow flowing streams carried <br /> only suspended clay sediment whereas the fast-flowing streams carried both sand, silt and <br /> clay. The sediment retention ponds probably allowed fine clays to pass through the system, <br /> whereas prior to their installation, all of the sediment passed through. Another contributing <br /> factor may be that waters during the high-flow season are purer than those of the low flow <br /> season, but this is probably only a minor component, and probably not decipherable from <br /> the data. <br /> 4b. TSS versus time. TSS concentrations were highest during the first two years of data <br /> collection and decreased, progressively, through the end of 1984. After 1984, TSS fell to <br /> very low values, and remained low through 1992. It appears that mining had a positive <br /> impact on the sediment load; site management practices, particularly the installation of <br /> sediment retention ponds, caused the sediment load to diminish. <br /> 4c. TSS versus flow. TSS shows a slight positive exponential relationship with flow. <br /> However, virtually all of the high TSS measurements were taken during lower flow. <br /> 5a. Evaluation of outliers. Data for Conductivity, TDS, and TSS were plotted relative to <br /> flow, and curves were fit to the data. A one standard deviation range was established in <br /> order to highlight the samples above (or below) one standard deviation from the mean for <br /> any given rate of flow. The choice of one standard deviation was selected arbitrarily. There <br /> is no reason to believe that this method is any more valid than other, more or less empirical <br /> methods for evaluating the data. Rather, the test was to see whether the positive outliers <br /> bear any relationship to time of sampling. <br />