My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1993-11-15_PERMIT FILE - C1981017 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1993-11-15_PERMIT FILE - C1981017 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2021 5:39:58 PM
Creation date
6/7/2012 11:10:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/15/1993
Doc Name
Request for federal Intervention (Part 2 of 2)
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
may not be occurring in this part of stream. It cannot be said <br /> definitely that higher solids levels and possible siltation from <br /> the mine are causing the undesirable(af ects on the fish, but the <br /> data is/quite clear in pointing out a very obvious problem. Whether <br /> the cutthroat and brook trout reestablish themselves further down <br /> stream and whether or not reproduction takes place was never <br /> determined due to the inaccessibility of the lower stretches of the <br /> creek. <br /> In light of the fact that the Snowmass Coal Company has not <br /> reached its goal of zero discharge a bioassay is recommended during <br /> times the mines do discharge to pinpoint any further problems <br /> associated with the mines and aquatic life. <br /> The early 1900's marked the beginning of coal mining in the <br /> Coal Creek drainage. Approximately thirty more years of production <br /> are expected from these mines which currently produce 1 ,000,000 <br /> tons a year of high quality coal. Mid-Continent Resources, Inc. <br /> currently operate five mines which discharge periodically according <br /> to sump holding pond levels. It was impractical to sample the <br /> direct effluents because of infrequent and unscheduled discharge, <br /> but samples were taken from creeks near each mine (Stations CC-2, <br /> CC-3 and DC-1 Tables 26, 27, and 29) . <br /> The 115 mine discharged to the upper reaches of Coal Creek. The <br /> 13 mine discharge entered Coal Creek between #5 mine and Dutch Creek. <br /> Mines °1 and "2 had a combined effluent which entered the upper <br /> section of Dutch Creek as does the 94 mine effluent. Figure 1 <br /> - 19 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.