My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1993-11-15_PERMIT FILE - C1981017 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1993-11-15_PERMIT FILE - C1981017 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2021 5:39:58 PM
Creation date
6/7/2012 11:10:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/15/1993
Doc Name
Request for federal Intervention (Part 2 of 2)
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
THE CRYSTAL RIVER, DRAINAGE STJDY - _ <br /> August 1978 to May 1979 C <br /> r <br /> um 81989 <br /> Introduction <br /> A water quality investigation of the Crystal River drainaahMON!7OR#."GSEC,10tj <br /> GPA\0 JUNCTION <br /> was undertaken in the summer of 1978. Of primary concern were <br /> the detrimental effects by the Mid-Continent Coal Company (now <br /> Mid-Continent Resources, Inc.) and the Anschultz Coal Company <br /> (now Snowmass Coal Company) to tributaries of the Crystal <br /> River. The secondary purpose was to establish referral data <br /> on this drainage for future monitoring or enforcement and locate <br /> any deleterious situations which would require a more in depth <br /> study. <br /> ;P <br /> Summary and Conclusions <br /> 1 . The Crystal River between the town of Crystal and <br /> Redstone is a clean cold water fishery receiving no point <br /> source discharges. <br /> 2. The Redstone wastewater effluent flow was Si?!"=low or <br /> non-existent that no impX'V'Was recognizable in the Crystal <br /> River. <br /> 3. The entire Crystal River exhibited excellent water <br /> quality except for a few elevated heavy metals concentrations <br /> at stations CR-8 and CR-9. <br /> 4. The Crystal River Fish Hatchery effluent did not pose <br /> a waste loading problem to the Crystal River. <br /> 5. Stations CR-9 and CR-10 had high fecal coliform and <br /> fecal streptococcus counts probably due to cattle grazing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.