My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1993-11-15_PERMIT FILE - C1981017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1993-11-15_PERMIT FILE - C1981017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2021 6:47:45 PM
Creation date
6/7/2012 11:09:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/15/1993
Doc Name
Request for federal; Intervention (Part 1of 2)
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
181
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• • <br />Memo to Steve Renner <br />Coal Basin Examination <br />page 4 <br />of an old topographic swale. I recommend that these seeps be <br />developed by excavating and backfilling them with gravel to promote <br />better drainage and decrease residence time for groundwater. This <br />should stabilize the material and help to prevent mine drainage <br />acidity problems. Finally, the small triangle of ground below the <br />newly aligned ditch should be graded to drain towards the southeast <br />and into the ditch. It will be difficult to achieve more than 1% <br />grade in this area. Hopefully by completing this combination of <br />improvements, less saturation will occur due to ponding of spring <br />melt waters in this poorly drained bog area. <br />Mr. Dulaney expressed his dismay at redisturbing the old access <br />road which he suggested had achieved the sort of natural slope <br />readjustment they believe all roads at Coal Basin should be allowed <br />to attain in final reclamation. Tony and I observed that the coal <br />refuse pile is required to have a permanent diversion. The <br />operators representatives also suggested they'd like to allow the <br />road to drain in "sheet flow" over the outslope and into Dutch <br />Creek, approximately 100 feet down its course from the disturbed <br />area. I believe this is not desirable and recommended against it <br />because "sheet flow" without a concrete pan or cleaned resistant <br />bedrock inevitably results in gully formation and increased <br />sediment generation. <br />cc: Tony Waldron <br />Larry Routten <br />Doc: M: \MIN \JAP \DUTCHCRK.WPF <br />JP /jp <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.