My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1983-09-01_PERMIT FILE - C1981017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1983-09-01_PERMIT FILE - C1981017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2020 8:46:50 AM
Creation date
6/7/2012 10:40:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/1/1983
Doc Name
Mining and Reclamation Plan Approval Package
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ground water quality and water levels are measured in the 12 alluvial <br /> wells in the permit area. Ground water quality data collected from four <br /> of these wells are presented in the permit application. An additional <br /> eight monitoring wells were completed and monitoring commenced in October, <br /> 1982. <br /> Cumulative Hydrologic Assessment <br /> The reader is referred to the detailed assessment on this subject located <br /> in the Technical Analysis starting on page 26 and ending on page 43. In <br /> general there are three mines in the Roaring Fork River Valley area that <br /> could affect water quality and quantity. These mines are: <br /> 1) Garfield Energy Corp - Sunlight Mine <br /> 2) Snowmass Coal Company - North Thompson Creek Mines <br /> 3) Mid-Continent Resources, Inc. - Coal Basin Mines <br /> The three underground mines along the Roaring Fork River may impact ground <br /> water quantity by one or more of the following: <br /> - induced inflows into the mines through faults and fractures <br /> which provide communication between the mine and overlying and <br /> underlying aquifers and surface water; <br /> - dewatering of the coal, roof and floor with the advance of <br /> mining; and <br /> - subsidence-induced flows into the mines. <br /> Faults and fractures which cut the bedrock strata produce a localized <br /> increase in porosity within the strata. If the faults and fractures do <br /> not become sealed by clays, they may become conduits for the flow of <br /> ground and surface water. When encountered within the mine, faults and <br /> fractures will dewater. The amount of water flowing into the mine from <br /> these sources depends on porosity and permeability of faults or fractures, <br /> and on the open vertical connection within the faults and fractures <br /> between the coal seam and sources of ground or surface water. <br /> The impacts of subsidence due to mining can be expected to vary in <br /> magnitude and extent. This variation will result from a combination of <br /> numerous natural phenomenon and from the effects induced by underground <br /> mining. Surface water and ground water can both be influenced by <br /> differences in timing of mining and the physical environment. It is <br /> assumed that all mining will result in subsidence at some future point in <br /> time, although surface manifestation may require many years to occur. <br /> Therefore, control and prediction of subsidence are critical, necessary <br /> measures, which should be implemented before and during any mining <br /> activity. <br /> In light of these observations a range of subsidence impact scenarios are <br /> possible. Subsidence related cracking could increase surface and <br /> overburden infiltration rates, diverting water from streams and <br /> -12- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.