Laserfiche WebLink
-13- <br /> Above the Rollins formation and the "B" bed or Coal Basin seam is a thick <br /> layer of mudstones, sandstones and shales of 370 feet to 425 feet in <br /> thickness, known as the Lower Bowie Shale Submember. Bowie shale occurs in <br /> the Williams Fork Formation. <br /> The Middle sandstone submember overlies the Lower Bowie shale and is similar <br /> in many respects to the Rollins sandstone. It ranges in thickness from 30 <br /> feet to 130 feet and is fine-to-medium grained, quartzitic to feldspathic, <br /> poorly to moderately sorted, with a clay matrix at the top. <br /> Directly above the Middle sandstone is a coaly, black to gray, sandy siltstone <br /> which merges into the overlying coal seam, known as "M" Creek or Middle Bed <br /> Seam. The coal seam ranges from 5 feet to 20 feet thick, and is mined from <br /> the No. 2 mine entry. <br /> The overlying sequence is the Upper Bowie shale submember. It consists of <br /> mudstones, sandstones, and shales and is around 200 feet thick. <br /> The upper sandstone submember, which overlies the Upper Bowie shale, is up to <br /> 100 feet thick. It is similar to the Rollins and Middle sandstone, except <br /> that grain size is somewhat more coarse. <br /> Above the Upper sandstone, is the Paonia shale member of the Williams Fork <br /> Formation. It consists of and includes the Placita and Sunshine Coal <br /> Intervals. <br /> The coal seams mined at Coal Basin are the "B" bed and the "middle" bed. The <br /> two other seams in Coal Basin are considered uneconomic to mine using current <br /> mining methods. <br /> Further information on the geology of the permit area can be found in Volume <br /> 4, Chapter III-D of the application. <br /> The analyses of roof rock and coal (the floor material is coal) in Section <br /> III-D, Volume 4, indicate that the materials are generally high in iron and <br /> have a high sodium adsorption ratio (SAR). A sample of roof <br /> rock from Mine No. 3 had a high nickel value. The high iron levels and the <br /> high nickel value should not pose a significant problem because both iron and <br /> nickel are relatively insoluble ,at the pH values characteristically found in <br /> the roof and coal materials and water associated with these materials. In <br /> addition, the sodic nature of the materials is not a significant problem. <br /> High sodium levels would not affect the plant growth characteristics of the <br /> materials since these sodium quantities are not toxic to plants, but rather <br /> would destroy the structure of soils, particularly in soils of predominantly <br /> clay texture. The result of this breakdown is a decrease in the infiltration <br /> rate, thus a decrease in water available for plant growth. However, the coal <br /> processing waste (a combination of coal and roof rock), which may be subject <br /> to revegetation activities is coarse textured, thus there should be no <br /> problems. <br /> The proposed operation is in compliance with the requirements of this section. <br />